Post from Kim Warren's Blog:
Bill Todd and Other Lawyers Who Harm Their Profession

Suggestions that a RICO lawsuit could be filed against the Ohio Chamber and those who helped to assault (and re-elect) Justice Alice Robie Resnick in 2000 make this a good time to ponder what such ads have done to the judiciary.

If you don't remember the ads, let me refresh your memory. A woman dressed like Lady Justice peeked under her blindfold to see which donors were stacking piles of cash on her scales of justice. The heaviest donors won  favorable rulings. 

Back when the infamous Lady Justice ads were on the air, the Ohio State Bar Association abandoned its usual no-comment posture and condemned the chamber, saying the ads undermine "the public's trust in a fair and independent Supreme Court. From the Oct 22, 2000, Columbus Dispatch:

"The message it sends is, "If you can throw enough money at a Supreme Court justice, it will affect his vote,' " said Reginald S. Jackson, the association president.

I find it fascinating that the Bar Association didn't name names. So let's name the biggest offender: Bill Todd. He was the lawyer who created the Chamber's bogus non-profit used to illegally hide the donors' names, and pay for the shameless ads.

He was the lawyer who defended the illegal ads. And he was the lawyer who lost the case defending the illegal ads.

Since that remarkable campaign, studies have shown that the public's confidence in the judiciary has plummeted.


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Harming the judiciary
By Bluefish Jun 21st 2007 at 12:46 pm EDT
A majority of states elect their judge, and money has been pouring into judicial races for years.

A recent report by the Annenberg Public Policy Center showed that "big money and mudslinging are undermining public trust in the judiciary and the ability of judges to act independently and impartially.''

More troubling, a survey conducted by the center showed that 70 % of those polled said they believe the necessity to raise campaign funds will affect a judge’s rulings once in office. Sixty-three percent believe that pressures from past contributors would affect a judge’s fairness and impartiality to a great or moderate extent.

To read more about the legacy of the Bill Todd's of the world, view the entire report: Link.
  



Subscribe
Share/Save/Bookmark



Watch Live: House Health Care Reform Debate and Votes
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Mar 21, 12:11 PM
Comments (0)
Will Steve Driehaus Become A Health Care Hero?
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Mar 21, 10:36 AM
Comments (0)
Updated With Video! Rep. Kaptur To Vote Yes For Health Care Reform
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Mar 21, 09:44 AM
Comments (0)


A Single-Payer Healthcare System For Ohio
By: Dennis Spisak
Posted Mar 21, 06:49 AM
Comments (0)
ZACK, WHAT WOULD NIXON DO?
By: David Lore, Licking County Pro-Active Citizens
Posted Mar 19, 10:30 AM
Comments (0)
David Sirota: WHAT'S THE MATTER WITH DEMOCRATS?
By: Doug
Posted Mar 19, 09:11 AM
Comments (0)
why we fight!
Now my friends,I am opposed to the system of society in whic...
House Republicans denounce racial slurs hurled at Democrats
Washington (CNN) - House Republican leaders criticized the u...
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Link Prove that the shouts actually occurred, and I'l...
No shortage of rednecks, is there?
Rep. Ryan should be admired for his candor. No wonder this c...
Interesting reading on this
Found some interesting links for those interested in more in...
Re: Dennis, do you have learning disability?
No, Brian, I do not have a learning disability, but my two s...

Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account