Post from Kim Warren's Blog:
Bill Todd and Other Lawyers Who Harm Their Profession

Suggestions that a RICO lawsuit could be filed against the Ohio Chamber and those who helped to assault (and re-elect) Justice Alice Robie Resnick in 2000 make this a good time to ponder what such ads have done to the judiciary.

If you don't remember the ads, let me refresh your memory. A woman dressed like Lady Justice peeked under her blindfold to see which donors were stacking piles of cash on her scales of justice. The heaviest donors won  favorable rulings. 

Back when the infamous Lady Justice ads were on the air, the Ohio State Bar Association abandoned its usual no-comment posture and condemned the chamber, saying the ads undermine "the public's trust in a fair and independent Supreme Court. From the Oct 22, 2000, Columbus Dispatch:

"The message it sends is, "If you can throw enough money at a Supreme Court justice, it will affect his vote,' " said Reginald S. Jackson, the association president.

I find it fascinating that the Bar Association didn't name names. So let's name the biggest offender: Bill Todd. He was the lawyer who created the Chamber's bogus non-profit used to illegally hide the donors' names, and pay for the shameless ads.

He was the lawyer who defended the illegal ads. And he was the lawyer who lost the case defending the illegal ads.

Since that remarkable campaign, studies have shown that the public's confidence in the judiciary has plummeted.


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Harming the judiciary
By Bluefish Jun 21st 2007 at 12:46 pm EDT
A majority of states elect their judge, and money has been pouring into judicial races for years.

A recent report by the Annenberg Public Policy Center showed that "big money and mudslinging are undermining public trust in the judiciary and the ability of judges to act independently and impartially.''

More troubling, a survey conducted by the center showed that 70 % of those polled said they believe the necessity to raise campaign funds will affect a judge’s rulings once in office. Sixty-three percent believe that pressures from past contributors would affect a judge’s fairness and impartiality to a great or moderate extent.

To read more about the legacy of the Bill Todd's of the world, view the entire report: Link.
  



Subscribe
Share/Save/Bookmark



Health Care for America Now Applauds Senator Brown for Supporting Real Health Care Reform
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Jul 2, 01:25 PM
Comments (0)
Statement by the President on Health Care Reform Bill Released by Senate HELP Committee Today
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Jul 2, 12:38 PM
Comments (0)
Kennedy, Dodd Deliver Strong Public Option Bill That Is $400 Billion Below Estimates
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Jul 2, 11:56 AM
Comments (0)
What Happened to the Signers of the Declaration of Independence
By: Doug
Posted Jul 4, 08:31 AM
Comments (0)
SEIU 1199 HEALTH CARE WORKERS PRAISE SEN. BROWN FOR LEADERSHIP ON FIXING HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
By: SEIU District 1199
Posted Jul 3, 12:04 PM
Comments (0)
The Employee Free Choice Act is Vital for Economic Recovery
By: Doug
Posted Jun 27, 10:43 PM
Comments (0)


He DOES have a temper
Silly me. I thought Sen. Voinovich was such a Boy Scout.
GOOD SUGGESTION
A recent poll showed the vast majority of voters did not eve...
Senator Rush Limbaugh!?
Franken was an Air America Radio host. I bet neither Rus...
We are seeing the impact of repression
I would like to see this study expanded to examine the incid...
I saw about 38 green jobs
on Link I think they were in new york but i am not sure, n...
He's good enough,
And smart enough, and gosh darn it, people like him.

Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account