| By D Waldman - May 2, 2007 10:59:14 AM ET |
Recently Bill SB 16 passed in the Ohio Senate and will be sent to the house for a vote next. The bill call prohibits all dancers working in strip clubs from “touching” any patrons and they must remain at least six feet away from them. It also calls for all strip clubs to close at 11:00 pm. This legislation will not surprisingly shut down most if not all strip clubs in Ohio.
This legislation was introduced by the activist group Citizens for Community Values. In addtion to not liking strip clubs, they also are against hotels that show adult movies, gambling and of course homosexuality. The refer to strip clubs on their website as, "And they have tried to paint nude strip clubs and other sex businesses as safe places of entertainment, rather than as the hotbed of criminal activity that our courts have recognized them to be." The group got a petition signed that introduced the bill to be voted on.
This is another example of a small special interest group going out of its way to influence public policy that the majority of the public does not agree with. There is already legislation for each community to decide if they want adult establishments, such as strip clubs in their community. This new legislation is unnecessary and takes away power from local governments. This new state wide regulation is totally unwarranted. There is also the freedom of speech issue that such a law would violate.
The CCV says they are trying to reduce “prostitution and violence towards women”, but shutting down strip clubs will not address either of those issues. All that will happen are the thousands of people that are employed by the stripping industry in Ohio will lose their jobs and patrons will go to other states for their entertainment. The CCV is on a religious moral crusade to get rid of something they don’t like. On their website they have information how you can get a similar bill submitted in your state.
This is an example of rabble rousing for an issue that doesn’t exist. If stripping was such a problem wouldn’t legislation have already been proposed without waiting for a special interest group to submit it?
Several of the senators have said they felt pressure from them to pass the bill. The CCV has the voting record on their homepage so people can see who they should vote for. I for one will not vote for any of the senators who voted for the bill as, I do not feel that they had their constituent’s wishes in mind as much as their own reelection campaigns. Politicians need to stop listening to these special interest groups with their lobbyists and listen to the people who voted for them in office.
With this link you can find you local representative and email them your opinion on the bill. Here you can find the contact in formation for you state senator to contact them as well. Show the politicians that you have an opinion too and that a small minority does not speak for the majority of the public.
Comments are closed for this post.
You can also write your State Representatives directly through Progressohio's Speakout email system
Link
Phil is the head of CCV, the wacky Cincinnati group that seems to stand alone in its insistence that this bill is needed.
Phil is a self-described porn addict. He has been married three times and has been in bankruptcy court twice.
I am powerless to explain why ANYONE listens to CCV -- especially Republicans who are supposed to support personal responsibility (Phil clearly has none of that) free enterprise, limited government, local control and less lawsuits.
Backers of this bill have been hurting the state for decades -- and their allies look the other way.
In the 1990s, CCV pushed for the prosecution of the local art museum on obscenity charges. The museum was vindicated -- and the taxpayers had to pay for this frivolous prosecution.
Then CVV won support for an anti-gay city charter amendment. This intrusive measure cost the city $43 MILLION in canceled convention business. Some of the more tolerant trade associations didn't want ot give their money to a city that sanctioned bigotry.l
When city leaders paid into a campaign to repeal the amendment -- and the good people at P&G donated heavily to that campaign -- CCV began a boycott of P&G.
Ohio needs to find ways to clone the P&G's of the state -- not hurt them. Has anyone looked at the statistics on unemployment lately?
I realize it might be unpopular to stand up for strippers but why are so many so reluctant to stand up for free speech?
The bill is a waste of time and energy.