Bob Hagan Supports Marc Dann: Does $10,000 have anything to do with it?
I guess Bob Hagan voted no on the impeachment of Marc Dann because Marc Dann gave the Hagan political campaign fund $10,000 dollars last November.

Bob Hagan has shown his true colors with this vote. His vote in favor of Marc Dann means Mr. Hagan supports unethical practices in Columbus, cover-ups, sex scandals, etc.

And we want Bob Hagan to continue to represent the 60th district?

Dennis Spisak-Independent Green Party Candidate for State Representative-60th District

campaign site: Http://votespisak.tripod.com

Reader Comments
  
There you go again....
By Modern Esquire May 14th 2008 at 9:14 pm EDT
Spouting off on Bob Hagan without the facts. First, the House NEVER voted on impeachment of Dann. So how could Hagan had voted against something the House never voted on?

Second, Hagan was one of the CO-SPONSORS of the articles of impeachment.

I'd expect another retraction and apology to State Representative Hagan. You're starting to prove that you simply don't know enough about current events to be competent to represent the people.

You falsely accused Hagan of taking campaign donations from Republicans when in fact they went to a Republican member of the General Assembly. Now, you're here saying that Hagan voted against something the House never voted on that he, in fact, is a co-sponsor of.

And when will you disclosure your campaign finances since you seem to care so much about what's in your opponent's?
Re: There you go again....
By User from Struthers, OH May 14th 2008 at 9:58 pm EDT
Hagan voted no yesterday to let the inspector General's office to launch an investigation into Marc Dann's office. You can read the vote here From the House Jounal, May 13, 2008:

to authorize the Inspector General to conduct an
investigation of alleged misconduct in the Office of the Attorney General;
The motion was agreed to without objection.
The question being, "Shall the emergency clause stand as part of the bill?"
The yeas and nays were taken and resulted - yeas 87, nays 8, as follows:

Representatives Boyd, Brown, Chandler, Hagan R., Koziura, Luckie, Sykes,
and Williams S. voted in the negative-8.

The question recurring, "Shall the bill pass as an emergency measure?"
The yeas and nays were taken and resulted - yeas 83, nays 13, as follows:

Those who voted in the negative were: Representatives
Beatty Brown Chandler Domenick
Foley Hagan R. Koziura Otterman J.
Skindell Stewart D. Sykes Ujvagi
Williams S.-13.
Having received the required constitutional majority, the bill passed as an
emergency measure.

I will not apology for Hagan's vote is on record.
When you are a state representative and you accept a $10,000 political contribution from a corrupt Attorney General and still have not announced whether you will return the contribution I have the right and so does the public to question the real ethics and moral convictions of State Representative Bob Hagan.

Dennis Spisak
Re: There you go again....
By Modern Esquire May 15th 2008 at 8:49 am EDT
Well, your POST says he voted against impeachment. Which he did not. He was a co-sponsor of the impeachment. So, you ARE wrong, and you should be big enough to admit your error, apologize, and correct it!

There were plenty of Democrats who voted against the IG's office because they believed that to do so was the House shirking its constitutional duty to conduct its own investigation. If you had watched the debate of the legislation, you would know that.

The fact is that Hagan co-sponsored the actual articles of impeachment. Your post falsely claims that Hagan was against impeachment.

And now you're spinning like a true politician.

BTW, when will you allow the public and people like me the ability to review YOUR campaign finances so we know who's influencing your moral and convictions hypocrite?
  



Video: Cordray, Boyce Swearing In Ceremonies
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Jan 8, 07:01 PM
Comments (0)
Join the Impact- Ohio Statewide Rally for Equality on Jan 10th
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Jan 8, 05:26 PM
Comments (0)
Husted Continues To Claim He Lives In Kettering: Apparently Doesn't Shower Or Flush The Toilet Much There
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Jan 8, 02:23 PM
Comments (1)
2009: TESTING A TOE IN MURKY WATERS
By: Gray Hunter, Licking County Pro-Active Citizens
Posted Jan 8, 02:26 PM
Comments (0)
Prosecutors Bully Ohio Voters: Ohio Election Justice Campaign Calls for Day of Silence on January 6, 2009
By: Ohio Election Justice Campaign
Posted Jan 6, 04:10 PM
Comments (0)
1580 AM WVKO
By: User from Westerville, OH
Posted Jan 6, 12:10 PM
Comments (4)
He's lying
With a face like that, he showers twice daily, then buffs hi...
The Importance of Education..
It’s nice to hear this news! For us to have a better f...
Re: And the difference between...
Gee Jill, I guess I'd have to know which "bloggers" you're r...
And the difference between...
bloggers and Joe the Journalist is what exactly?
Faith-based silliness
How sad that organizations like the Ohio Christian Alliance ...

Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account























Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz




Enter your Email