Post from Dave Harding's Blog:
Payday Lending Referendum Could be Booted from the Ballot Firm Known for "Deception, Irregularities" at Center of Storm
Consumer groups welcomed state election officials' announcement that they will hold a hearing to determine whether the payday lending referendum should be kept off of the Nov. 4 ballot.

Groups battling the lenders asked Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner to keep the measure off of the ballot because referendum organizers failed to comply with a disclosure law intended to protect voters from fraud in the petition-gathering process.  Brunner announced late Thursday that she is taking the unusual step of appointing a hearing officer to hear the case.

The controversy centers on Arno Political Consultants, a California-based company hired by the national payday lending lobby to help collect the 241,365 signatures needed to put the referendum before Ohio voters.

Allegations of serious irregularities during the 2004 election prompted legislators to pass a package of anti-fraud reforms. The reforms include a new requirement that those who are paid to supervise signature collecting file a disclosure form with the Secretary of state form - known as a Form 15.

A Form 15 asks for the circulator's name, address, employer and type of ballot issue being pursued. The intent of the new requirement is to give voters and election officials added tools to police petition circulators.

Public records requests turned up no Form 15 for Arno employees working on the payday referendum.

"Numerous allegations around Arno's shoddy track record show why these forms are necessary to alert the public about which outside outfits have been brought in to influence Ohio's elections,'' said Bill Faith, executive director of the Coalition on Homelessness and Housing in Ohio, one of the groups leading Ohio's effort keep the payday lending law in place.

According to "Abusing Direct Democracy,'' a 2007 report by the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, Arno is known for being "accused of deception and illegalities.''

The accusations include:

Washington 2003: Hiring circulators who lied to the public;

Florida 2004: Hiring circulators who submitted fraudulent petitions and petitions with signatures from the dead;

Massachusetts 2005: Training circulators in "bait and switch'' tactics;

Nevada 2006: Hosting a 'fraud party' where circulators were taught to forge signatures.


Click here to see the signature gathering abuse document Abusing Direct Democracy

The national payday lobby is financing the on-going Ohio referendum, which seeks to ask voters to allow them to continue to charge 391 percent annual interest on a typical two-week loan. Earlier this year, legislators passed, and the governor signed, a new law that caps the annual interest at 28 percent.

The campaign has been dominated by allegations that petition circulators insisted the referendum was designed to lower interest rates -- not raise them.

A YES vote on Issue 5 keeps the 28 percent rate cap in place. A NO vote allows lenders to keep charging 391 percent interest.

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Payday lenders still can't get it together
By Ohio Consumer Advocate Sep 12th 2008 at 1:01 pm EDT (Updated Sep 12th 2008 at 1:01 pm EDT)
Surprise! Surprise! More irregularities and apparent failure to comply with state laws by the payday lenders! This is a part of a larger pattern of lies, deceptions and shameful practices by the payday lenders.

Not only do the payday lenders appear not to want to provide voters with the truth about their defective product, they would prefer not to comply with state laws that protect Ohioans from outside interests influencing electoral politics in the state.

After all the incidences of payday circulators lying to voters about the referendum, I am led to believe that the issue probably shouldn't be on the ballot b/c most Ohioans don't really support the payday lenders or 391% interest.

Vote yes on issue 5 (if it gets to the ballot)!
  
Brunner should kick them off the ballot
By User from Dublin, OH Sep 12th 2008 at 2:51 pm EDT (Updated Sep 12th 2008 at 2:51 pm EDT)
This whole campaign has been about the lenders telling lies -- lies to get people to sign the petitions, lies about what the issue is really all about and playing hide the snake (Arno).

These forms were required after the '04 election was marred by idiots who signed petitions as "Dick Tracy'' and "Mary Poppins.''

The forms help us voter figure out who is trying to influence us and help the election overseers find them when they misbehave.

Given Arno's history of misbehaving, it's no wonder they want to be hard to find.
  
Yawn!
By User from Lisbon, OH Sep 12th 2008 at 3:30 pm EDT (Updated Sep 12th 2008 at 3:30 pm EDT)
Both sides are trying long shots that are just stupid. The attempt by the lenders to eliminate the 10 day review period and now the anti-lending groups that want them thrown off the ballot. Both sides are wasting a lot of time and effort.
Not a waste to ensure payday lenders comply with law
By Ohio Consumer Advocate Sep 12th 2008 at 5:27 pm EDT (Updated Sep 12th 2008 at 5:27 pm EDT)
I don't think it is a waste to make sure that the payday lending industry, known for it's deceptive tactics, is complying with state election laws. The proposed hearings will let us know whether or not the payday lobby or their contractors has engaged in any fraudulent activities that would poison the integrity of the electoral process. I'm glad the Secretary of State has called for this hearing and hopefully we'll learn what else the payday lenders have been up to. The deceptive ads, lying circulators and misleading petition summaries apparently weren't enough for them!
Re: Not a waste to ensure payday lenders comply with law
By User from Lisbon, OH Sep 14th 2008 at 12:38 am EDT (Updated Sep 14th 2008 at 12:38 am EDT)
The petition summaries were fine, the election process has not been "poisoned". Yawn, yawn, yawn.

Don't you have something better to do with your life then eliminate 6,000 people's jobs?
  
What is the truth?
By User from Cleveland, OH Sep 17th 2008 at 10:03 am EDT (Updated Sep 17th 2008 at 10:03 am EDT)
The calculations used to figure the "APR" for the payday loan as opposed to credit cards, mortgages, banks, insurance, etc. is flawed. The deception may be in the opposite direction!

I will vote NO on issue 5 until I am convinced otherwise!
The Truth In Lending Act Requires Using APR To Compare Loans
By Dave Harding, ProgressOhio Sep 17th 2008 at 11:27 am EDT (Updated Sep 17th 2008 at 11:53 am EDT)
Loans can be confusing. Slick lenders can quote a lot of different numbers that mean different things. In an order to reduce confusion, the US Government passed the Truth in Lending Act. One of the provisions of this act is that lenders quote APR to potential borrowers.

Link
Re: The Truth In Lending Act Requires Using APR To Compare Loans
By User from Lisbon, OH Sep 17th 2008 at 6:51 pm EDT (Updated Sep 17th 2008 at 6:51 pm EDT)
Yes $15 per $100 is soooooo very confusing.
Re: The Truth In Lending Act Requires Using APR To Compare Loans
By Dave Harding, ProgressOhio Sep 17th 2008 at 7:28 pm EDT (Updated Sep 17th 2008 at 7:28 pm EDT)
No, it's not confusing at all $15 for 2 weeks per every hundred dollars borrowed = 391% APR.

If you can't understand APR like the APR for your mortgage or the APR on a car loan . . . I sincerely hope you do not borrow from anyone for anything ever because your probably getting ripped off all the time.

Just as the payday lenders used to be able to rip off the uninformed in Ohio before the law protecting the innocent from the predators was passed by an overwhelming bi-partisan majority in the Ohio House and Senate.
Re: The Truth In Lending Act Requires Using APR To Compare Loans
By User from Thibodaux, LA Sep 28th 2008 at 10:06 am EDT (Updated Sep 28th 2008 at 10:06 am EDT)
It is nice to see interest in the Truth in Lending ACT ... which was created as part of the Consumer Credit Protection Act of 1968. Unfortunately, before (1967) the act was passed the then Under Secretary of the Treasury (later Secretary), Joseph Barr, guided the Subcommittee hearing the bill to use the "actuarial APR" ... also called the "simple interest" or, as the CCPA states, the "NOMINAL APR". That rate (according to section 226.14(c))is calculated by multiplying the rate for a payment period by the number of payment periods in a year.
As anyone who has taken Finance 101 will know, the mathematically-true APR (called the EFFECTIVE APR) is the compounded APR, calculated by compounding the rate for a payment period by the number of payment periods in a year.
On your payday loan, where a 14-day, post-dated check for $115 is given to receive $100 then, the NOMINAL APR is indeed 391% [15%*365/14) = 391.071%.
The mathematically-true, EFFECTIVE APR is 3723.661% [(1+.15)^(365/14)-1]. The symbol"^" in a spreadsheet means compound the next function.
The Act allows for a tolerance in quoting the Nominal APR of 1/8th percent (0.125%). The mathematically-true, EFFECTIVE APR is 26,660 1/8th different than the untrue, NOMINAL APR
[(3723.661-391.071)/0.125].
  



Subscribe
Share/Save/Bookmark



Representative Fudge To Vote Yes On Health Reform
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Mar 20, 12:19 PM
Comments (0)
Video: Will Zack Space Become A Health Care Hero?
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Mar 20, 09:57 AM
Comments (0)
Chair of Hamilton County Democratic Party Responds to John Boehner's Vicious Comments About Rep. Driehaus
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Mar 20, 08:59 AM
Comments (0)


ZACK, WHAT WOULD NIXON DO?
By: David Lore, Licking County Pro-Active Citizens
Posted Mar 19, 10:30 AM
Comments (0)
David Sirota: WHAT'S THE MATTER WITH DEMOCRATS?
By: Doug
Posted Mar 19, 09:11 AM
Comments (0)
Representative Steve Driehaus: Keep standing up for us, not the insurance companies
By: User from Washington, DC
Posted Mar 17, 11:30 AM
Comments (0)
Interesting reading on this
Found some interesting links for those interested in more in...
Re: Dennis, do you have learning disability?
No, Brian, I do not have a learning disability, but my two s...
I'm not voting for Ted Strickland
Brian, and I, as a middle class son of a steel worker, will ...
Dennis, Ted Strickland isn't going to vote for you
The people on this site MIGHT. But not if you refuse to answ...
If you haven't already....
Hi Bob, I strongly urge you to go check out the following we...
Brian, quit your cryin'
Brian, Brian, Brian: Why does Ohio have to be last to jump o...

Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account