Post from Dave Harding's Blog:
4th Anniversary of the War On Iraq Time Capsule: March 14, 2003
On March 14, as Bush failed to win support from the U.N. Security Council, his congressional allies stifled debate back home. Still, new developments raised new questions about the cost of the conflict and the candor of the President.

U.N. Resolution Appears Doomed
A U.S.-backed U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing the war against Iraq appears doomed to fail, senior U.S. officials and foreign diplomats admitted it.

The admission came after U.S. officials repeated assertions - but no evidence - that they were within striking distance of reaching the necessary nine votes on the deeply divided Security Council.
After its defeat appeared imminent, the Bush administration reverse couse and said will delay or possibly call off the vote.

Congressional Republicans Won't Allow War Debate
A demand by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass) and four other Democrats for a congressional debate over Iraq was denied by the Republican leadership.

The Democrats sent a letter to House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) asking him to designate five Republicans to participate in a debate on the alternatives to going to war.

"Why shouldn't the House have a major debate on this?" Frank said yesterday. "It's very frustrating to people in a democracy, and wrong, not to have a debate."

Cost Estimates for War Rise
After what columnist Georgie Anne Geyer called "deceptive blarney on the part of the administration over the cost of this war,'' new figures emerged. The cost of only postwar reconstruction of Iraq will be at least $20 billion a year and will require the long-term deployment of 75,000 to 200,000 troops to prevent widespread instability and violence, according to a panel of high-level officials brought together by the Council on Foreign Relations.

The report concluded that President Bush failed "to fully describe to Congress and the American people the magnitude of the resources that will be required to meet the post-conflict needs."

Fear of Huge Deficit Causes Push For Smaller Tax Cut
Ohio Sen. George Voinovich joined a bipartisan group of senators who announced they would accept a tax cut no smaller and no larger than $ 350 billion over 10 years, signaling to Republican leaders they may have to scale back the President's proposed "economic growth" tax cut.

Voinovich and the others sent a letter that said: "With the international challenges our nation faces, including a possible military engagement with Iraq, continuing tension on the Korean Peninsula, and the ongoing war on terrorism, . . . we believe that any growth package that is enacted through reconciliation this year must be limited to $ 350 billion."

Visit War and Remembrance

Reader Comments
No comments have been written yet.




David Robinson Needs You to ActBlue!
We Need You to ActBlue for David Robinson! Dear Robinson for...

TUESDAY in Columbus: "Which Side Are You On?" Health Care Rally
"We will not sacrifice profitability for membership.&...

Troops Give Obama A Standing Ovation
We've seen a lot of "staged" press events with the...

85 percent Unhappy with Economy
85 percent Unhappy with Economy July 18,2008 According to...

McCain Reacts To al-Maliki's Endorsment Of Obama's Withdrawal Timetable
In response to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s ...




Re: Another "Transcription" Error?
They did it again . . . See if was only a translation err...

They think they know what's best for you
In addition to HB 287's sponsor Rep. John Adams, please reme...

Another "Transcription" Error?
Just a couple of weeks ago Maliki's call for a withdrawal ti...

LINK TO STOP LOSS PRESS COVERAGE
VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE (VCS) AND SOUTH JERSEY NEWSPAPER S...

Cronies + grant $s = trouble
Or Buckeyes tickets. How lame that our economic development ...



Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account










Faculty
Outreach Manager
Conservation Organizer
Petitioner for Ohioans for Healthy Families
View All Jobs















Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz




Enter your Email