Post from Carol Cogitating:
Good News (and Bad News) for both sides of the Abortion Debate
Gov. Ted Strickland asked the 6th District Ct. of Appeals to drop his name from the state's effort to defend a bill that would restrict the use of the abortion drug RU-486. Strickland does not want to pursue reversal of a federal district court ruling that the state's ban on the use of RU-486 was unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals upheld the district court's finding to the extent that the law did not have an exemption for cases in which women would be at greater risk through surgical abortions.

On the flip side, Attorney General Marc Dann will continue to defend the law on appeal without the Governor's name.

The law in question makes it illegal for doctors to prescribe mifepristone (RU-486) after the seventh week of pregnancy. Under federal guidelines, the drug cannot be prescribed after 56 days, or eight weeks, of pregnancy. The law requires an FDA-recommended dosage that has since been determined to exceed what is needed to induce abortion.

The Akron Beacon Journal reported that according to the Ohio Department of Health, 4,700 of the 34,128 abortions conducted in the state in 2005, the last year for which statistics are available, were done by non-surgical methods. In that year, 57.3 percent of all abortions in the state were conducted before 9 weeks of gestation. Data was not kept on abortions between 7 weeks and 9 weeks.

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Marc Dann had no choice
By Daily Outrage Feb 21st 2007 at 5:30 pm EST
Although Dann voted against this bill while in the legislature, he's now wearing a different hat: That of Ohio's top lawyer. His job is to defend laws that have been passed by the Ohio General Assembly, whether he agrees with them or not. When Lt. Gov. Lee Fisher was the AG, he faced a similar dilemma. His chief counsel, Kate O'Malley, had to defend Ohio's so-called informed consent law. Both O'Malley and Fisher are pro-choice supporters. O'Malley, now a federal judge in Cleveland, was so good at her job that she successfully defended a law with which she disagreed. Let's hope the Dann forces aren't quite so good!
Re: Marc Dann had no choice
By Carol Cogitating Feb 21st 2007 at 8:20 pm EST
I suppose he was in between a rock and a hard place. I am torn. I would have preferred that they not fight a Ct. of Appeals decision and give Judge Delott the opportunity to revisit her injunction consistent with the Ct. of Appeals opinion. But, having said that, I hope that Dann's office is successful to the extent that the decision is dependent upon good legal counsel!
  



Subscribe
Share/Save/Bookmark



Health Care for America Now Applauds Senator Brown for Supporting Real Health Care Reform
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Jul 2, 01:25 PM
Comments (0)
Statement by the President on Health Care Reform Bill Released by Senate HELP Committee Today
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Jul 2, 12:38 PM
Comments (0)
Kennedy, Dodd Deliver Strong Public Option Bill That Is $400 Billion Below Estimates
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Jul 2, 11:56 AM
Comments (0)
What Happened to the Signers of the Declaration of Independence
By: Doug
Posted Jul 4, 08:31 AM
Comments (0)
SEIU 1199 HEALTH CARE WORKERS PRAISE SEN. BROWN FOR LEADERSHIP ON FIXING HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
By: SEIU District 1199
Posted Jul 3, 12:04 PM
Comments (0)
The Employee Free Choice Act is Vital for Economic Recovery
By: Doug
Posted Jun 27, 10:43 PM
Comments (0)


He DOES have a temper
Silly me. I thought Sen. Voinovich was such a Boy Scout.
GOOD SUGGESTION
A recent poll showed the vast majority of voters did not eve...
Senator Rush Limbaugh!?
Franken was an Air America Radio host. I bet neither Rus...
We are seeing the impact of repression
I would like to see this study expanded to examine the incid...
I saw about 38 green jobs
on Link I think they were in new york but i am not sure, n...
He's good enough,
And smart enough, and gosh darn it, people like him.

Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account