Ohio 18th Congressional District
This group is dedicated to electing a Democrat from Ohio's 18th Congressional District to the U.S. House.

"It’s astonishing that Republicans today are lined up overwhelmingly against a health care package that is more modest and moderate than one that Richard Nixon proposed in the early ’70s."   (Nicholas Kristof column, Access, Access, Access, New York Times, March 18.)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/18/opinion/18kristof.html?src=tp

Surely, in the health care debate, we've always known what Jesus would do.

Now, according to Kristof, we'd know what Nixon would do as well.

The question remaining this weekend is what our own local congressman, Zack Space (18th), and other holdout Democratic House members will do when the final bill comes up for a vote

It's a lot harder to figure out politicians than basketball players, and that's why I don't fill out brackets going into March Madness and I usually don't predict how any particular politician will vote.  In either case, too many ways the ball can bounce.

But I'm betting (for real, through my minimal campaign contributions) that although Space is holding out, hoping that Speaker Pelosi won't need his vote, in the end he'll do the right thing and vote "YES." if needed.

Why would he take such a political risk in his Republican-leaning district?:

  • He voted earlier for the more liberal House version of the health care bill and it's not like his Republican opponents and critics are going to forgive and forget, even if he votes NO on the final measure.  Can you imagine all seven 18th District Republican hopefuls quitting the race and throwing bouquets instead of bricks at the Democratic incumbent?  Do you really think a NO vote would lift the bullseye the GOP has put on Space's back?
  • Although a Democrat in a nominally Republican district, Space has amassed a large campaign war chest and won't face a well-known opponent, regardless who emerges from the messy Republican primary.
  • Space has done a good job over the past four years being attentive to the concerns of voters in his 16-county district, and has followed through with the energy and intelligence to do something about these concerns.  He's been responsive to farmers and agricultural interests and has looked out for the interests of small business and community development.  Progressives will support him because he's shown courage in supporting health care and cap-and-trade energy legislation. Yellow-dog Republicans (those who would vote for a yellow dog before ever voting for a Democrat) won't be in his column come November regardless of how he votes now, but by establishing creds as an independent thinker, Space should do okay with independents.
  • Space has been adopted as a favorite son by Speaker Pelosi and the Democratic House leadership, as well as by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.  Why would he jeopardize all that leverage in Washington?
  • What up-and-coming Democrat wants to be on the wrong side of history when health care is so central to not only the Obama presidency but the future of the party?
  • And now he can argue that he's only doing what (Jesus) (Nixon) would have done.

That's my view, anyway.  Just don't ask me where the Buckeyes will wind up in the Big Dance.  Let's hope that in this regard, President Obama (who gave Ohio State an early exit) doesn't know what he's talking about. 

The deterioration of our politics is shown in today's coverage in the Newark Advocate of a town hall debate in Mt. Vernon joined by Congressman Zack Space's seven potential Republican challengers in this year's 18th district race.

Seven is usually a lucky number but with this bunch, the GOP appears stuck with a rather weak field at a time when Space, a two-term Democrat, has to overcome not only the conservative leanings of his sprawling, mostly rural district but also the bitter partisanship which has spilled out of the health care debate in Washington.

Space was reportedly invited to participate but wisely didn't, since he would have been cast as the pinata.  Naturally, all the GOP hopefuls argued that he (and his fellow Democrats) had to go.  But, as the Advocate reported it, their talking points were exceedingly shallow given the complexity of the issues before Congress right now.  http://www.newarkadvocate.com/article/20100307/NEWS01/3070337

Clutching for the Far Right, tea-party vote, all seven chimed in on a chorus of lament about big government and high taxes leading the nation to ruin.

  • Newark businessman Beau Bromberg's solution was a cut in congressional pay.
  • Mt. Vernon farmer and former State Ag Director Fred Dailey would cut social welfare programs.
  • Thornville teacher/preacher Dave Daubenmire wants God-fearing folks to reject government aid.
  • State Sen. Robert Gibbs, Lakeville, apologized for votes he made to build light rail and increase sales taxes.
  • Former State Rep. Ron Hood, Ashville, declared himself "battle tested" and therefore electable.
  • Dover pastor Hombre Liggett delared himself not battle tested and therefore electable.
  • Ex-Zanesville Judge Jeanette Moll grabbed the flag as pro-gun, pro-life and pro-Constitution.

That's it, the face of the Republican Party in the 18th District: pro-gun, pro-life, pro-God and Constitution and opposed to any expansion (or even maintenance) of civil society through community taxation and/or government programs.

Compare these talking points to those raised by 18th District candidates in the spring of 2006, the last time there was this large a field of candidates in the district.

In April of that year, This Week - Licking County - asked each of the six candidates in the 18th for their views on the Iranian situation, health care reform and the future of Social Security.  With one exception, their answers showed serious thought by serious people.  Looking just at the health care responses:

  • Space, a Dover attorney running for the first time, said reform should allow the government to negotiate with the industry to bring down Medicare costs and permit Americans to buy cheaper drugs in Canada. (Alas, neither provision is in the pending reform bill.)
  • Rep. Bob Ney, the then-Republican incumbent, said legislation he introduced would extend tax credits to offset rising insurance premiums and "establish a safety net for the uninsured."  (Ney was forced to resign later that year -- and subsequently jailed - for corruption in the Abramoff scandal)
  • Zanesville Republican James Harris, a financial analyst, backed tax-free private health accounts and well as importation of cheaper drugs from Canada.
  • State School Board Member Jennifer Stewart, a Zanesville Democrat, would have reduced health costs by more use of generic drugs and local health care clinics as well as through government incentives to reduce patient co-pays.
  • Chillicothe Mayor Joe Sulzer, a Democrat, wanted the government to negotiate lower Medicare drug prices and permit re-importation of cheaper drugs from Canada and Europe.
  • Columbus property manager Ralph Applegate, a Democrat, was a tea-bagger before his time, but he at least admitted to being stumped by the problem: "I do not have an answer to that serious health-care question," he told the newspaper.  "Would you advise me, please?"

Four years later, Space is wrestling with how to vote on the Obama health care plan, Ney is out on parole and the other 2006 candidates in the district have evidently lost their ardor for serving in Congress (and who could blame them?).

Back in 2006, we were all overjoyed to be rid of Ney, whose junkets with and favors for the corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff rained shame on the GOP.  But considering the shallowness of the current Republican talking points, I have to admit a bit of Ney nostalgia is setting in.

Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.

Every once in a while this typing exercise has application in the wider world, as it did last night as the U.S. House voted 220-215 to approve the long-delayed health care bill.

We should be especially proud in Licking County that Congressman Zack Space, D-Dover, provided one of the crucial votes making this historic action possible.  This could not have been an easy vote for Space, who represents the normally Republican-leaning 18th District and who faces a tough re-election campaign next year against energized Republicans out to recapture the seat.

And, in fact, this was the second time this year Space has taken one for the team, the first being his vote to support the Obama administration's energy and environment bill.  See:

http://www.licopac.org/licking_county_issue_pac/2009/06/zack-shows-backbone.html

On the health bill, Space has withheld a firm endorsement for months because of concerns he had about the legislation's impact on small business and rural hospitals in his 16-county, largely rural district.

On Nov. 2, he stated on his web site that these would be the factors governing his vote:

"(1) Protecting Ohio’s consumers – With tens of thousands of Ohio consumers without access to quality, affordable health insurance and with insurance premiums rising by 129% since 2000, Congressman Space believes that allowing the status quo to continue is bad for Ohioans, bad for the economy, and bad for our country.

(2) Protecting Ohio’s small business – Our small businesses have seen their premiums increase an average of 18% more than those in larger firms, and any legislation must work to keep these costs down.  Any health reform bill must not saddle Ohio’s small businesses with costly mandates and must provide crucial assistance to our small businesses owners.

(3) Protecting Ohio’s rural health care providers – In any health reform, Space believes that rural hospitals and health care providers must not lose money on patients covered by a new health insurance plan."

See: http://space.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=20&parentid=8&sectiontree=8,20&itemid=834

Space also opposed any provision in the bill extending taxpayer-funded health care benefits to illegal aliens.  See: http://space.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=20&parentid=8&sectiontree=8,20&itemid=835 

Among the bill's many provisions are these, according to the Washington Post:

  • It would provide coverage for nearly all Americans and prohibit insurers from denying coverage on the basis of preexisting conditions or limiting lifetime benefits or dropping customers when they became ill.
  • It would immediately introduce discounts on prescription drugs for the elderly and reduce (and eventually eliminate) the infamous "donut hole" in drug coverage.
  • Uninsured people who can't get coverage could join temporary high-risk insurance pools, and "bridge" coverage would be extended to unemployed workers.

 With the bill now out of the House, attention returns to Senate action in coming months.  Comprehensive health care may yet stumble in the Congress, but this is the closest we've come to achieving it in the last half century.  So we need to thank Space and other House Democrats for making it happen and work to keep them in office next year.  Right now, for example, progressives should be writing letters in support of his position for the Advocate and other Licking County newspapers because we know he's going to get blasted from the Right.

As for the Republicans, they voted NO (with one exception) in the House.  The dissenters, of course, included Licking County's other congressman, Rep. Pat Tiberi, (R-12).  Let's remember that, and work to liberate Tiberi from his own government-run (i.e., Socialist) health coverage benefit after the next election.

GRAY HUNTER Cats supposedly are entitled to nine lives but nobody ever mentions retirement as an option for geriatric Toms.

No matter.  Take this as public notice that I, Gray Hunter, am retiring.....from politics, from blogging, from the whole messy and time-consuming world of digital chatter.  Whether you realize it or not, the Gray Hunter you depend on for political insights is actually an old feral cat.  An old feral cat who now intends to spend the rest of his days sleeping and eating by day, prowling by night, and enforcing barn-yard discipline on the younger felines at Folk Lore Farm (the females who disrespect old Gray by trying to eat out of his supper dish).

I only got into this game at the insistence of my "neighbor", the human who lives in the big house next to my barn.  David Lore, a retired journalist, wanted to try his hand at blogging but was reluctant to enter the fray under his own name.  So a bargain was struck.  We'd collaborate at LICOPAC (www.licopac.org ) by employing my moniker - as well as my snarky, don't-give-a-damn attitude - providing he'd do all the writing and typing and keep my food dish full.

It worked swell for several years.  Lore would sit out on his stoop at feeding time reading the newspaper while I would chomp down my high-protein pellets.  Being wild, I always kept my distance from him but still approached close enough to read the headlines (which is all a blogger needs to know anyway).  No words were spoken, although Lore always thought it funny to greet me by calling out, "Hey, Gray Hunter - cat got your tongue?" 

Still, there was communication.  He could tell by my scowl what I thought of the news of the day.

But lately I've become disenchanted with politics (at least that of the human variety).

And my blogging partner, being a former newspaper reporter, no longer finds it ethical to hide his identity (however loosely) while slicing and dicing political opponents by name.  So as with Evans and Novak, Huntley and Brinkley, this news team is now breaking up with each partner going his separate way.

So after today, if you have a complaint or an opinion about this site, tell it to Lore.  He'll be writing under his own name and no doubt be exhibiting a sunnier disposition.

The fact is that, being a barn cat, I could care less what you think or what you do as long as you just leave me alone.  I guess that makes me a political Independent, which sounds right for a cat.

As the Washington wag once said, if you want somebody in this town to listen to you, get a dog.

Congressman Zack Space, negotiating a tightrope on the health reform bill, said yesterday he hopes to support final passage this fall but isn't ready to commit yet.

Speaking to supporters at a fund raiser in Heath, the second-term Democrat called the committee version he voted for last week a "good starting point."   But, he added, "I'm reserving judgment on support for the final bill."

Space, who eastern Ohio district includes part of Licking County, finds himself at the center of a storm as a member of the so-called "Blue dog" caucus in the House which held out -- successfully -- last week for changes to the version of the bill before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.  This version now must be compromised with different language approved by two other House committees before a final House bill can be sent to the Senate.

Space said the Blue Dogs were trying to improve the bill, not stop it or kill it.

"I wanted to be part of a process that gets health care right, even if we don't get it right away," he said.  "It's too important to rush through."

The health system as it stands today is broken, he said, and needs to be fixed.  Space said he supported most of what was in the Obama-backed legislation put together in the House, including the creation of a Medicare-like "public option" to give consumers a choice between private and public insurance plans.

He withheld support, however, until administration and House Democratic leaders agreed last week to amend sections dealing with reimbursement rates for hospitals treating patients covered by the public option plan.  As originally drafted, hospitals would be reimbursed under the same formula now used with Medicaid patients.  Space and several other Blue dogs representing rural districts objected, holding out until they won a change in the committee version leaving hospital reimbursement rates up to future negotiation.

The problem, said Space, is that rural hospitals under Medicaid now get less in terms of reimbursement than do hospitals in urban settings.  "We can't afford to lose our hospitals," he said.  "That was a line in the sand I wasn't prepared to cross."

And it remains a deal-breaker in how he'll eventually vote on the bill, he said.

The "Blue dogs," described by Space as "fiscally responsible Democrats," are being both heavily courted and criticized as the White House and the congressional leadership seek to round up enough Democratic votes for passage -- without expectation of much Republican support.

Space was called to the White House for meetings on the legislation.  And President Obama tracked him down in Ohio yesterday, telephoning to thank him for his backing on the committee vote, Space said.

The congressman is running for re-election next year in a normally Republican-leaning district.  He, therefore, can expect an earful from both sides in the health-care debate during the August recess.

But while some congressmen were being savagely heckled  over the weekend by critics during local health-care forums, Space found a sympathetic audience at the fund raiser sponsored by the Licking County Democratic Club.  "It's good to be home," he said.

In helping craft yesterday's so-called "Blue dog" compromise on health care reform, 18th District Ohio congressman Zack Space, D-Dover, won at least a temporary victory in his efforts to make the measure more acceptable to conservative Democrats in the House.

On July 22, in a news release, Space outlined three major changes he hoped to see in the House version of the reform bill before it cleared the House Energy and Commerce Committee, on which he sits.  See:

http://space.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=20&parentid=8&sectiontree=8,20&itemid=737

According to CNN and other media reports, Space made progress in achieving all three of his priorities.  The Ohio legislator, serving his second term, was one of four conservative Democrats in the Blue dog caucus credited with working out the compromise with White House officials and House Democratic leaders.  Specifically:

  • Space said on July 22 he wanted "bold cost containment" to reduce the $1 trillion price tag on the earlier Obama-Pelosi plan.  According to CNN and the AP, the committee agreed to changes reducing total cost by about $100 billion.
  • Space said on July 22 he wanted "changes in the payment rate to protect our hospitals from bankruptcy."  He objected to a public option insurance plan which would negotiate hospital reimbursement rates on a formula at or near existing Medicare rates.  The revised committee bill eliminates this requirement, leaving rates up to separate negotiations, said CNN.
  • Space said on July 22 he wanted "higher exemption rates for small businesses." Previously, the plan would have required all businesses to provide health insurance to their employees or pay employees a stipend to buy their own insurance, exempting only those businesses with annual payrolls of $250,000 or less.  According to CNN, the revised committee version broadens this exemption to all businesses with annual payrolls of $500,000 or less.

A committee vote is expected Thursday.

According to news reports, however, the "Blue dog" compromise already has critics on both the Left and the Right.  And Energy and Commerce is only one of three House committees involved in the drafting - not to mention the Senate - and we're a long way from any final version which may emerge after legislators return in September from their August recess.

One Southern Republican has predicted that health care reform will prove to be Barack Obama's "Waterloo," a reference to Napoleon's decisive defeat by the British in 1815.

In fact, in any battle, the emperor usually escapes to fight another day. But in this fight, will a Democratic lieutenant such as 18th District congressman Zack Space survive the cross-fire?

Space, a second-term Democrat, meets with supporters on Monday (8/3) evening at the Steelworkers hall in Heath, 2100 James Parkway (off I-79).  Up until now, most such gatherings have been celebratory, given our local relief of having Space replace GOP felon Bob Ney, a legislator jailed for his involvement in the corrupt lobbying practices of Jack Abramoff. 

But this Monday's forum could have a quite different tone.

In brief, Space in Washington has cast his political fortunes with the so-called "Blue Dog" faction in the House, a pack of moderate Democrats who are pulling against the party leash, growling and snapping at what they consider the fiscal excesses of the health care proposals backed by Obama and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi.

This has, to put it mildly, upset many progressives who supported Space with their money and their time during two election campaigns but now want to see a strong health care reform bill enacted.  This may set up a spirited "dog fight" on Monday if Space's critics decide to show up and try and bring their wayward pooch to heel.

LICOPAC has always been a strong supporter of Rep. Space, but here are some of the questions we'd encourage his Licking County backers to ask:

  • In the abstract (and less abstract, for the future) does he agree with Obama that a single-payer system such as Medicare would be the best way to achieve universal coverage and cost reform?  (Obama, of course, isn't pushing for single-payer on the basis that it would be too disruptive now given that most Americans are already covered by private insurers through workplace plans).
  • If single-payer is not possible now, does Space support adding a new "public option" somewhat like Medicare to the mix of private insurance plans now available.  This public option is strongly supported by progressive Democrats as a way to avoid a corporate monopoly and to act as a brake on premiums and restrictions imposed by private insurers.
  • Does he, instead, prefer Senate proposals to offer this "public" option by establishing quasi-public health insurance co-ops?  If so, does Space favor a nationwide co-op or something less powerful, like an Ohio or multi-county co-op?  The size (and funding) of such co-ops matter if this type of public option is to have sufficient clout to negotiate rates and influence the private market.
  • Does Space agree with other "Blue Dogs" that the current house plan is excessive in subsidizing health insurance costs for low-and-moderate income families with incomes up to $88,200?  Does he feel that middle-income families can afford to buy insurance without such subsidies, even though even with subsidies, middle-income families would have to pony up as much as 12 percent of family income to be covered as required?
  • Even with promised cost savings, the administration says it needs to find $300 billion to $400 billion in new revenues to pay for the $1 trillion reform package.  Which of these funding proposals does he oppose, which could he support?
  • The "Blue Dogs" have been critical of the price tag on the Obama-Pelosi package, as well as the cost impact on small businesses.  But at the same time, Space and others "Blue Dogs" have pressed for increased federal reimbursement to hospitals and medical providers in rural areas.  Isn't this a contradiction? 
  • Reports are that special interests in the debate (ie, insurance and pharmaceutical companies, doctors, hospitals etc.) are pouring millions of dollars in campaign contributions into the accounts of "Blue Dog" Democrats in hopes of enacting a business-friendly plan.  Would Space, who has long declared he will accept no contributions from lobbyists, disclose whether he has received significant contributions from opponents of single-payer and "public option" plans? 
  • Finally, does Space agree with Obama that the worst alternative would be to keep the system as it is?  Would he support a less-ambitious bill which only moves the country part-way towards extending coverage and/or reducing runaway medical costs?

What questions would you ask? 

Lost in the avalanche of grief and gossip over the death of pop idol Michael Jackson was House passage yesterday (219-212) of the omnibus energy and environmental bill by a narrow 7-vote margin.

And Licking County progressives should note - and take pride in the fact - that our congressman, Rep. Zack Space, D-Dover, voted YES on this important piece of legislation, despite opposition from farm, coal and energy lobbies so influential in his 18th District.

The Dispatch, which has fretted gleefully for months over Space's dilemma, noted in today's story on the vote that "the measure has provoked intense opposition from many Ohio officials."

Those of us who have supported Space in the past but worried about his blue-dog timidity in the face of the agriculture and gun lobbies should take heart with this show of backbone.

And kudos to the media panelists last night on WOSU-Radio's Columbus on the Record who noted Congressman Space's courage in voting for the bill.

Now, it should be recognized that the measure is not everything environmentalists wanted.  But it does set goals for reducing greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide  and establishes a cap-and-trade incentive system for pollution reductions, a similar approach to that which helped curb acid rain emissions back in the 1980s.

Yes, it will likely increase electric rates, especially in Ohio, since most of the state's generation depends on coal.  Off-sets, however, are a new program to help low-income ratepayers absorb the rate increases and new government subsidies for wind and solar which could create new jobs and industries here.

If you credit Space with making the hard - but right - choice on this bill, you might $how your appreciation at www.zackspace.org

If newspapers want to survive, they need to provide information quickly and efficiently that readers are not likely to obtain easily from other media.

Today's Dispatch, for example, has a "good news" piece by syndicated columnist Tom Teepen about final Congressional action on the Omnibus Public Lands Management Bill of 2009 (H.R. 146).  He writes:

"Forget the bum economy for a minute. You just got richer. We all did. A lot richer.

 

After years of dawdling and fussing, both abetted by an indifferent-to-antagonistic Bush administration, the House and Senate finally have passed an omnibus wilderness bill that will protect more than 2 million acres from despoliation. President Barack Obama was pleased to sign it.

The bill brings the highest level of federal protection to sites in nine states, from California to Virginia. Key sections of several national parks and monuments receive heightened security. A number of historic sites benefit.

National forests will be preserved against development encroachments. The nation's system of designated "wild and scenic" rivers will be extended by a thousand miles -- a 50 percent increase.

Our national parks, forests, historic sites and monuments are the nation's endowment, our trust fund for the country's future. They amount to a patrimony of incalculable worth."

See the complete column at http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/editorials/stories/2009/04/01/teep01.ART_ART_04-01-09_A9_G6DDMGB.html?sid=101

But why, after reading Teepen's piece, should I have to spend another 15 minutes on the Internet tracking down the official name of the legislation, the bill number and how our Ohio representatives voted on the measure?

(FYI, all Ohio Republican representatives (including Pat Tiberi, Delaware) voted NO while all Ohio Democratic representatives (including Zack Space, Dover) voted YES.)

Instead, the timely reporting of how our representatives and senators in Washington vote is pretty hit-and-miss.  Even when the Dispatch's own Washington reporters write about legislative action, they often don't say how central Ohio congressmen voted, or only do so days later.

With congressional voting tallies now available virtually instantaneously through a number of Internet sites, why can't the newspaper help out its readers by automatically telling us not only about legislative action but about how our area congressmen voted?  Needless to say, most readers are not going to spend time doing their own research. 

The failure to track legislators' votes is even more problematic at the Ohio Statehouse.  But it's more understandable, since Statehouse voting is more difficult to track on a timely basis.

We know that Barack Obama on Nov. 4 became the leader of the party.

The question now is whether that's the Democratic Party, the Obama Party or some cobbled-together combination of the two.

The new President-elect is still more than a month away from taking possession of the White House, and already such winds of discord are swirling, from Chicago to Washington and -- yes -- into even Licking County, Ohio.

On Thursday, for example, about 30 Obama supporters met at Licking County Democratic headquarters in Newark to explore what change means in their futures. Everyone in the room vowed to remain politically active for progressive causes after Jan. 20. The questions now are what to do and how to do it.

The meeting, which reached no conclusions, proved to be somewhat premature.

In this morning's email, for example, there was a Democratic Party alert from Obama campaign manager David Plouffe to an upcoming nationwide series of house parties to address just these kind of issues:

"On December 13th and 14th, supporters are coming together in every part of the country to reflect on what we've accomplished and plan the future of this movement. Your ideas and feedback will be collected and used to guide this movement in the months and years ahead," it said.

And, in this morning's Dispatch, an AP story recounted that "Obama aides are weighing whether to keep the ($30 million campaign surplus) to build a massive grass-roots program to support his agenda or to cycle that money to the party apparatus."

http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/national_world/stories/2008/12/06/Obama_Dems_1206.ART_ART_12-06-08_A3_QLC5A8F.html?adsec=politics&sid=101

True, Plouffe's memo was circulated by the national Democratic Party. But at both the national and local level, it's hard to see right now where all this will go.

There are certainly more important problems facing the nation and its incoming president than how to spend that $30 million left over from Barack's $745 million campaign. What is significant, however, is whether Democrats and the sort of independent progressive activists who flocked to Obama can find common cause on the local level in the years ahead.

Here, discussions have just begun as to whether Obama volunteers not previously active in local Democratic politics would now join the local party or affiliate with existing independent groups (such as LICOPAC or the Licking County Women's Democratic Caucus) or maybe form a new organization or organizations to pursue different goals.

Can those local activists who were so enthused about Obama's run for the White House become equally engaged now in trying to elect Democrats running for county offices, the state legislature and the Congress? Or should these Obama warriors now focus on promoting specific issues, such as universal health care, or spread the word by lending their weight to community service projects?

Some answers may emerge before Obama ever takes office. Local volunteers agreed to meet again once more information is received from Washington and/or Chicago as to just what this reported "massive grass-roots program" might involve.

In addition, a number of Obama volunteers said they intend to stop by this Tuesday evening when the Licking County Democratic Club holds its regular monthly meeting (7 p.m., at the county administration building, 20 S. Second St., Newark).

http://www.lickingcountydemocraticparty.com/

There is precedent for this, of course.

After the 2004 election, a number of previously uncommitted Kerry campaign volunteers were faced with the same sort of choices. Many joined the county Democratic Club, revitalizing the local party which had struggled for years from a lack of manpower and resources.

And at the same time, some of us decided not only to stick with the party but to also develop new local political action organizations -- LICOPAC and more recently the women's Democratic caucus -- to focus on specific issues and the congressional campaigns.

(Since early 2005, LICOPAC has worked on behalf of Democratic congressional candidates in the 12th and 18th Districts while promoting voter education, redistricting reform, the preservation of Social Security and sick-leave benefits for all Ohio workers. We have also been active in networking with progressives in neighboring counties and developing regional action through the Central Ohio Coalition of Democratic and Progressive Organizations.)

It's called evolution, and it ain't easy. But it's a sign of health that we, as progressives and Democrats, can adapt to change as it happens in our lives and not just talk about "change" as a campaign buzz word.

For two days now, heavy tanker trucks have been rumbling up and down my rural road, hauling pig manure from a nearby feed lot to juice up farm fields to the west.  The ground shakes, the air smells, we can't wait for the transfer to be complete. This must be what it's like on Pennsylvania Avenue as the Bush administration gets set to vacate back to Texas.

Now that's the change we need!

Other random thoughts two days after the election:

  • A lot has been said about how Barack Obama's election should revive the nation's reputation in the eyes of the world.  But let's also realize that Ohio stands a little taller since Tuesday night.  Ohio, the state which provided the industry, the leadership and the manpower to make America great, has been blamed now for eight years for helping put George Bush over the top in 2000 and then sealing the deal for another four years in 2004. But on Tuesday night, it only became apparent that Obama was on the victory road when Ohio turned blue shortly after 9 p.m.  Ok, NO MORE OHIO JOKES.
  • As we noted yesterday, however, Licking County hasn't yet gotten the word that a new day is dawning.  According to preliminary totals at the LC Board of Elections, Barack with 41 percent ran slightly better than John Kerry, who got 37.8 percent in 2004.  On the other hand, Democratic Congressman Zack Space in his winning re-election effort lost ground in Licking County, gaining 54.7 percent of the vote here as compared to 60.3 percent in 2006.  Meanwhile, the vote here for Licking County's other congressman, Republican Pat Tiberi, remained virtually unchanged, 66.6 percent in 2008 as compared to 66.1 percent in 2006.
  • This is not to fault the work of Obama organizers in Licking County.  I really appreciated how hard they were working on Halloween Eve when the only trick-or-treater that showed up at our rural McKean Township door was an Obama volunteer collecting names!  We NEVER get trick-or-treaters out here in the country, and we certainly have never seen Democratic canvassers before, especially those for a presidential campaign.

  • If you enjoyed the recent book about blue-collar politics, Deer Hunting with Jesus, you'll want to enjoy this follow-up in the Washington Post about how the denizens of Winchester, Va., approached this week's election.  See it at : http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/01/AR2008110101841.html?referrer=emailarticle

Tuesday's election marked an historic shift for the nation but -- unfortunately -- just more of the same for Licking County.

The whoops and shouts were loud and sustained last night at the local Democratic election party at the Center Pub in Newark as, shortly after 9 p.m., Ohio was declared for Obama, making his eventual nationwide victory look inevitable. Hours later, the Obama victory was sweetened by Democratic gains in the U.S. House and Senate, the election of Richard Cordray as state attorney general and the flipping of the Ohio House to a 51-48 Democratic majority.

But in Licking County, it was another wipe-out for the Democrats. Only freshman State Rep. Dan Dodd and freshman 18th District Congressman Zack Space survived the night as Republicans took over all three seats on the Licking County commission and a field of Democratic newcomers and judicial candidates went down to defeat, often by large margins.

The Space and Dodd victories were significant since both legislators wore GOP bulls-eyes on their backs, having won two years ago in districts normally safe for the Republicans.

In many ways, however, last night resembled the 2006 elections where Democrats made great gains at the Ohio Statehouse and in Congress but failed to dent traditional GOP control in local races.

The Blue team, however, showed potential for the future in backing thoughtful new candidates such as Doug Moreland for county commissioner, Don Hill for state representative and David Robinson for the U.S. House (12th District). We can only hope that they -- and others -- stay in the fight and come back benefitting from this experience to challenge again in 2010.

Also a big plus was that behind the ballot box, the big winner of the night was Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner who has, since her election in 2006, has withstood a withering attack from Statehouse Republicans intent on making her "too controversial" for re-election in 2010. Two headlines in this morning's Dispatch tell the story:

VOTING PROBLEMS? NOT IN OHIO (pp. A1)

FRAUD ALLEGATIONS FEW DESPITE TURNOUT (pp. A5)

The attacks on Brunner are all about controlling which party gets to gerrymander state and federal legislative district redistricting after the 2010 census. As Dispatch senior editor Joe Hallett wrote back in 2006:

"For decades, Ohio has used a system that awards gerrymandering power every 10 years to the political party that wins two of the three races for governor, secretary of state and state auditor. That power has been abused by both parties, most recently Republicans, who has ensured their legislative majorities by virtually eliminating competitive elections."

As of now, Democrats control the governor's office and secretary of state's office, while Republicans hold the auditor's office. With Gov. Ted Strickland still riding high in the polls, Republicans have decided to try and unseat Brunner, a relative unknown, by linking her to what has now proven to be the phony issue of voter fraud.

We were reminded again last night that the Ohio GOP's congressional Maginot Line held firm once again thanks to gerrymandering. The 12th District Republican, the lackluster Pat Tiberi, converted his massive financial advantage as an incumbent to defeat Robinson with only minimal deployment of TV advertising and direct mail. And in Franklin County, it appears that gerrymandering once again defeated Democrat Mary Jo Kilroy from overcoming GOP majorities in rural Union and Madison counties.

In the 2006 congressional elections, Ohio sent 11 Republicans and 7 Democrats to the U.S. House, even though the total combined vote for Democratic congressional candidates here was 1.97 million as compared to 1.78 million for the Republicans.

So while we can cheer Barack Obama's historic victory, it remains true that all politics is local and on both the local and state level, Democrats still have much work to do.
Round 3 of the Presidential campaign debate series played out like round 15 in a heavyweight prizefighter match, as Republican John McCain threw a last-minute flurry of jabs, a knockout punch being his only hope against Democrat Barack Obama who was winning on points.

Okay, the boxing analogy is a cliche. The Dispatch preview on Wednesday was headlined, "Last Round," featuring a graphic showing two robots in a ring. George Will, on ABC-TV last night following the "fight," concluded Obama won by letting his opponent punch himself into exhaustion, Mohammed Ali's old game. But cliche or not, the boxing analogy works.

Throughout the 90-minute Hofstra University debate, McCain was the puncher, landing a few good ones to be sure but never really denting Obama's calm composure, the thing about Obama that many voters find most attractive in these acidic and troubled times. As in the long primary campaign against Hillary Clinton, Obama has overcome the "fighter" by demonstrating confidence and maturity and intelligence, the traits of a real leader.

Bottom line: good fight, John, but it looks like Barack will wear the Belt.

(Before getting into the "blow by blow," let's not forget the warm-up act Wednesday afternoon featuring vice presidential nominee Joe Biden and Gov. Strickland at OSU-Newark's Adena Arena. For the record, several thousand partisans crammed into the "Home of the Titans" to hear the Delaware Democrat give his usual stump speech as part of a sweep across central and southern Ohio. If you thought you heard anything new being said, you haven't been listening.)

Obama's Best Moment: His dismissal of the McCain-Palin campaign attacks against him for "palling around" with 1960s radical William Ayers and Obama's so-called links to ACORN, the voter recruitment campaign under fire for falsified voter registrations. Obama explained calmly that he was 8-years-old when Ayers, now a university professor, was on his youthful rampage and that his only relation with ACORN was in the past, as an attorney for a client. "This says more about your campaign than it does about me," he told McCain.

McCain's Best Moment: Responding to the Obama campaigns repeated attempts to tie him hand-and-foot to the Bush administration, McCain said, "I am not President Bush. If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should have run four years ago."

Obama's Worst Moment: Asked to cite specific spending cuts he would recommend as president, Obama came up only with one: a $15 billion saving by ending subsidies to insurance companies. McCain, by contrast, said he'd support an across-the-board spending freeze, cuts in defense budgets, elimination of pork-barrel earmark appropriations.

McCain's Worst Moment: His stumbling over the "woman" issue. First he praised running mate Sarah Palin as a "role model for women" despite growing evidence that the bloom is off that rose with most voters, including women. And then, after Obama said he voted as a state legislator against a bill outlawing partial-birth abortions because it didn't provide exceptions to protect the health of the mother, McCain said that whole "health of the mother" issue was overblown. "They've stretched the meaning of health-of-the-mother," said McCain. "That can mean anything."

Double Fudge: Both Obama and McCain said they'd choose future Supreme Court justices strictly on the basis of merit, without making abortion a litmus test. Then McCain added, "I don't believe anybody who supports Roe vs. Wade would have those qualifications." And Obama said he'd expect his choice to be a judge who not only understands the law but the real environment in which people live.

Pandering To The Base: McCain didn't bring up Ayres and ACORN, moderator Bob Schieffer did. But once these punching bags were in play, the Republican took full opportunity, while accusing Obama of running a dirty campaign. And Obama, during their discussion on energy, twice referred to the need to rebuilt the auto industry through loan guarantees and more fuel-efficient cars. Did you catch that, Ohio and Michigan?

Absentee Winner: Joe the Plumber, of course, the common man from Ohio extolled on numerous occasions by McCain throughout the debate. Even as I write this at minutes before Midnight, there are hundreds of reporters nationwide trying to track down this poor guy for an interview. Maybe McCain should have picked a plumber rather than a Palin as his running mate.
What is John McCain's problem?

That was my reaction to tonight's first presidential debate in Mississippi. It wasn't really about the policy or even the political language - that was pretty predictable on both sides. It was about body language.

For nearly two hours, McCain ignored Barack Obama, having a conversation with moderator Jim Lehrer, even when Lehrer urged him to respond directly to the Democratic candidate. Obama talked directly to McCain, referring to his opponent as "John." McCain, grinding his teeth in a tight smile, never looked at Obama and always referred to "Senator Obama" as though Obama was not sharing the stage.

It struck me as a clear case of passive aggression on the part of McCain, which made my teeth grind. By passive aggression, I mean avoiding direct confrontation with those who disagree with you, preferring to smirk and stonewall and diminish another's abilities.

Why would McCain act so dismissive?

He's the guy who supposedly wanted a series of 10 town hall forums with Obama, and has frequently complained about being dissed on that by his Democratic opponent. Is this how he'd behave in a casual format?

McCain is a guy who says he'd be a President who could conduct his office in a bi-partisan manner. And yet, he wouldn't even look at his Democratic counterpart in this election race, or recognize his presence. That seems a poor way to demonstrate bi-partisan tendencies.

McCain didn't blow his top, to be sure, but he did come across as an angry old guy who bottles it all up to the point of not even acknowledging an opposing point of view. At one point, in an otherwise predictable argument over meeting with foreign leaders, McCain said he'd meet "anybody" with proper pre-conditions. But now we have to believe that if a President McCain sat down with Putin or the leaders of China, Korea or Iran, he wouldn't look them in the eye.

We all knew McCain doesn't like Obama. A quick, chilly handshake at the end of the evening didn't change that. But who thought that McCain's resentment about this younger and more articulate rival would result in a debate freeze-out rather than a boil
In this era of pervasive and mass communications, 24-hour news cycle and instant replay, why can't I get these questions answered?:

1/ Is 12th District Congressman Pat Tiberi running unopposed this year? In a Sunday editorial, the Dispatch endorsed Tiberi for a fifth term, without ever mentioning his opponent, Democrat David Robinson. Admittedly, Robinson has been ignored all along by the media since his surprise primary win last March, but when did he become a MSM non-person? And, if against all odds, Robinson wins on Nov. 4, some poor late-night political reporter is going to have to scramble to find out who this guy is!

2/ Given John McCain's marital and health history, it's perhaps understandable why wife Cindy always posts herself one step behind her man at every public event. How are they going to keep her from being at John's shoulder at Friday night's presidential debate? (If Cindy gets to back-seat drive, so does Michelle).

3/ Again, in the Dispatch, confusion reigns when in results from the latest Ohio Newspaper Poll, it's reported that John McCain leads Barack Obama 48-42 percent among surveyed voters although, by a margin of 46-39%, these same respondents think Obama "best understands the problems facing Ohio." So do a good many Ohioans worry more about Georgia (the country, not the state) than they do about Ohio? So much for this election being all about the economy.

4/ But really, why would either one of these guys still want to go to work at the White House next January? As soon as they're sworn in, the country will expect them to resolve two sticky wars, put everybody back to work, bring down gasoline prices, rebuild New Orleans (and now South Texas) and get Congress to reform the health care and financial regulatory systems. And do it without any money, since that giant sucking sound you just heard was Wall Street swallowing up what precious little is left in the U.S. Treasury. Don't you think at times that Barack feels like placing that 3 a.m. call to Hillary saying, "Hey, if you still want the nomination, it's yours!"

5/Where have all the campaign bumper stickers gone? I've seen more Obama stickers on cars than I see Obama signs on lawns, and visa versa for McCain. (And I've seen one Kerry 04 sticker gamely hanging on to prime bumper space, even though the owner had second thoughts and tore off the "Edwards" side). No doubt many people (and some local governments) think it's too early to plunge into the pre-election sign wars, but -- hey -- early voting starts on Sept. 30!

6/ Which leads me to wonder, why don't we just save ourselves the pain (and campaigns the cost) of another seven weeks of campaign ads and just open the polls and have everybody vote on Sept. 30? With the storm clean-up and the economic crisis and the upcoming holiday season, don't we already have enough on our plate for October? And really, anybody who's clueless about the candidates and issues on Sept. 30 will probably be just as clueless come Nov. 4.

So, what's your question?
Why is it that those who claim NOT to be politicians often sound more like politicians than do the pros?

Listen, for example, to Mt. Vernon cattle rancher Fred Dailey, a Republican, explaining his credentials to replace Congressman Zack Space, D-Dover, in the 18th District:

"I'm pro-family, pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, pro-worker, pro-business, pro-family farmer, pro-defense and pro-American." (Columbus Dispatch, 9/9/08)

Okay. We can accept that. Wouldn't want a Congressman who was anti-family.

But where does Dailey stand on apple pie?

Can we trust this guy?

"Pro-defense," he does explain, means that if he's elected to Congress, he'd defer such questions as war and peace to the military, "freed of political concerns." Not exactly the way our democracy is set up under the Constitution.

But to be accurate here, Dailey isn't just another happy GOP warrior. According to the article, he's anti-taxes, anti-big government, anti-federal spending, anti-estate taxes and anti-earmarks.

That last item is interesting because I can remember Rep. Space's predecessor, Republican Bob Ney, coming to Mt. Vernon only two years ago to argue strongly in favor of earmarked home-town appropriations in front of an audience of local officials.

But that was when the Republicans still controlled the Congress (and thus the flow of earmarked goodies). And before Ney was indicted, convicted and jailed for getting too greedy at the trough
It seems I wasn't the only viewer who took strong exception to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's dismissal of Barack Obama's service as a Chicago community organizer…and of the value of community organizing in general.. during her speech in St. Paul Wednesday night (see yesterday's Community News posting, Gov. Palin: This Is How Democracy Works!)
The Chicago Tribune (see today's Dispatch, A4) quotes Obama as saying he finds Palin's remark "curious."
Appearing in Lancaster, Pa., he explained:

"I would argue that dong work in the community to try and create jobs, to bring people together, to rejuvenate communities that would have fallen on hard times, to set up job-training programs to areas that have been hard hit when the steel plants closed, that that's relevant only in understanding where I'm coming from, who I believe in, who I'm fighting for and why I'm in this race."

Also curious was the fact that McCain, in the wind-up of his speech last night, urged all Americans to get involved in their communities and in the political process to bring about change. One way to do that, of course, is community organizing, regardless of your party.
Palin, on the other hand, seemed to assume that community organizing only referred to Tammany Hall-type recruiting of the urban poor. And she calls herself a reformer!

McCain was more partisan when, in his speech yesterday, he went after Obama by saying "I'm not running for president because I think I'm blessed with such personal greatness that history has anointed me to save our country in its hour of need."
The Republican audience cheered lustily at this, perhaps forgetting that in 2000 and 2004 their party was just as eager to support a Republican standard-bearer who claimed his mandate from God.
You may assume that because you sat up late watching John McCain's speech last night, you don't need to read about the GOP convention in today's paper.

You would be wrong.

Yes, today's Dispatch main convention stories predictably swoon over McCain and his running mate, Sarah Palin, without adding anything you don't know already. But that's to be expected, given the Dispatch's Republican leanings and - perhaps more importantly - the habit of journalists to put at least first-day priority on stenographic rather than analytical coverage.

Still, we have to learn how to read newspapers the way the Russians do: look for the small items at the bottom of the column, and for what is NOT being reported.

Let's look at what's buried first:

---(Page A8) Former 12th District congressman John Kasich, once widely viewed as a responsible budget hawk, is now trying to kick-start his fledgling gubernatorial campaign by joining the loonies in the Ohio General Assembly pushing for repeal of the state income tax. This is overkill, says former Bush budget director Robb Portman of Cincinnati (also eyeing a gubernatorial run) who prefers tax "reform." As the Dispatch's Joe Hallett points out, "replacing the $9.1 billion generated by the income tax would not be easy. The 5.5 percent state sales tax would have to leap to around 12 percent to raise a similar amount."

---(A6) While all eyes were on St. Paul, Vice President Dick Cheney is setting the stage for the showdown with Russia by "insisting" that the former Soviet republic of Georgia be admitted to NATO. The last paragraph of this AP story discloses that "U.S. officials have said it is likely that more military assistance will be forthcoming at some point to help the badly routed Georgian forces rebuild again."

Maybe this is what John McCain meant when he predicted there would be more wars even if Iraq and Afghanistan are pacified.

Now consider what's missing from today's edition:

---No mention of the demonstrations last night during McCain's speech by anti-war veterans who raised signs criticizing the nominee's position on veterans benefits. They were shown briefly on television several times but didn't get any ink, at least in the Dispatch.
---Even more curious is why the Dispatch on its editorial page has been mum on the Sarah Palin nomination, at least up until now. Maybe the newspaper just wanted to wait and make sure she was, in fact, nominated at the convention and will publish its Valentine this weekend. But ever since Bush was elected, the Dispatch has been critical of the influence of the Christian Right on the Republican Party, and of Bush for catering to the fanatic fringe.
I'm not crazy enough, as a 67-year-old grandfather, to put my toe into the political whirlpool stirred up by Sarah Palin about the responsibilities of motherhood. But there was one thing she said last night having nothing to do with parenting which really stuck in my craw:

"I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a community organizer except that you have actual responsibilities."

In this, of course, Palin as John McCain's pit bull and running mate was comparing -- to her advantage -- her tenure as one-time mayor of the small Alaskan town of Wasilla to Obama's work in the late 1980s as a community organizer in Chicago. (He was director of the Developing Communities Project, a South Side church-based community organization. According to Daily Kos, DCP under Obama grew from one to 13 staff members and a budget of $400,000 a year, with a focus on tenants' rights, job training and college preparatory tutoring.)

Now, Obama is a big boy and certainly capable of responding to this and other political buckshot sprayed his way this week by Palin and other GOP convention speakers. But somebody needs to also defend "community organizers" who do great work for little or no pay to keep people and communities from sinking into ruin and despair, especially in these hard times.

And it's personal, because my father was a union community organizer in northeast Ohio and across the Midwest in the early 1930s during a period when you could get beaten or killed for promoting worker rights.

Just who are these community organizers that Palin dismisses so casually?

Aside from labor organizers like my dad, Martin Luther King comes to mind in terms of civil rights as does Susan B. Anthony. Probably the most famous community organizer in history was Jesus, something which probably hasn't occurred to Palin and her fellow maxi-Christians.

And what do these "community organizers" do?

They light fires under small town mayors and governors like Palin and even Presidents to do the jobs they were hired to do. You see, governor, mayors do have "actual responsibilities" but they don't always live up to them. And when the politicians and bureaucrats fail to take responsibility, it's up to us, as volunteers and community organizers, to pressure them or depose them.

When Palin put these activists down, I immediately thought of the famous Chicago writer, Studs Terkel, who spent much of his life profiling the courage and tenacity of everyday people in dire situations and the community organizers who fought for them against often impossible odds.

In his 2003 book, Hope Dies Last, Terkel quotes Roberta Lynch, a Chicago labor organizer, about her role:

"It's about action," she said. "You feel that things can happen, the possibility, the hope. You feel ordinary people can do extraordinary things. Something comes along unexpectely, something no one could have predicted...people can surprise you."

And here's how Elaine Jones of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund explains in the same book (pp 144) why we need community organizers, even if we have mayors and governors and judges and presidents:

"Now the basic question is, how much can the law alone do? I still believe in the power of law. We can't ignore the courts. We have to fight. But you have to have community pressure and involvement . There must be public pressure to make people respond. There has to be mobilization. Grassroots....I believe the system can change, but it's only if those of us who understand these issues stay involved in them. That's the only way change comes."
Freshman Congressman Zack Space thought for a while today that his campaign for re-election might literally crash and burn in a Fairfield County farm field.

As Space told the story during a Newark fundraiser this evening, he was flying with his committee chairman, Minnesota Congressman Collin Peterson, from Zanesville to Lancaster in Peterson's Beechcraft Bonanza when the single-engine aircraft suddenly lost all electric power.

Peterson, chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, was in Ohio to support Space in his bid for a second term as congressman for Ohio's sprawling 18th District, which covers 16 eastern Ohio counties. The Dover Democrat is a member of the agriculture committee, so the two lawmakers were spending the day visiting farms across the district.

Space admits to a life-long phobia about flying, and so he admits the malfunction gave him plenty to think about other than politics. "I began wondering if I could survive jumping out of the plane into some body of water," he said at the fundraiser.

Peterson, however, seemed less concern. The problem with the single-engine Beechcraft Bonanza was a bad alternator, which had gone out several times before, Peterson said. Despite the power outage, the Minnesotan landed the plane without incident in Lancaster.

"We were never in any danger," Peterson said.

The two congressmen last night told supporters that energy is the number one issue now facing Congress.

And as Space now knows, when you're out of power, you're in for a white-knuckle landing.
Posts By Month
2010

January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2009

January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December



Subscribe
Share/Save/Bookmark



SEIU and UFCW poised to rescind support for Zach Space
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Mar 19, 04:45 PM
Comments (0)
Kilroy Announces Support of Health Care Reform Bill
By: Dave Harding, ProgressOhio
Posted Mar 19, 03:38 PM
Comments (0)
Bob in his own words
By: Bret Thompson, ProgressOhio
Posted Mar 19, 02:37 PM
Comments (1)


ZACK, WHAT WOULD NIXON DO?
By: David Lore, Licking County Pro-Active Citizens
Posted Mar 19, 10:30 AM
Comments (0)
David Sirota: WHAT'S THE MATTER WITH DEMOCRATS?
By: Doug
Posted Mar 19, 09:11 AM
Comments (0)
Representative Steve Driehaus: Keep standing up for us, not the insurance companies
By: User from Washington, DC
Posted Mar 17, 11:30 AM
Comments (0)
If you haven't already....
Hi Bob, I strongly urge you to go check out the following we...
Brian, quit your cryin'
Brian, Brian, Brian: Why does Ohio have to be last to jump o...
Dennis, do you have learning disability?
Because you apparently cannot even comprehend what you write...
Proud of Bob
People like Bob make me proud to be an American, and I will ...
they just keep digging their hold deeper
In an effort to claim that "99%" of AFP members are well-beh...
Re: Typical Brian Whine and Cheese
Brain, Brian, Brian: You're whine and cheese posts are becom...

Login
Don't have an account yet?
Create Account