John McCain has worked closely with the national press to gain his “maverick” reputation - and that’s why women are choosing John McCain! On the complicated issues of womens’ rights and reproductive choices, we need a strong man with years, and years, and years of experience in the halls of Washington to think and speak for us - and that man is John McCain. With John’s record on choice, he’s uniquely qualified to make our most personal, private choices for us as President.
“I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned.”
“[R]epeal of Roe vs. Wade…would then force ‘x’ number of women in America to undergo illegal and dangerous operations.”
John McCain’s leadership has earned him a 0% rating from NARAL, a 0% rating from Planned Parenthood, and his independent, bipartisan thinking is backed up by his impressive voting record and positions on women’s health and freedom of choice.
- Supports repealing Roe v. Wade. (May 2007)
- Voted YES on barring Health and Human Services funding to medical clinics for low-income women that perform abortions. (Oct 2007)
- Voted YES on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. (Jul 2006)
- Voted NO on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives. (Mar 2005)
- Voted YES on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus. (Mar 2004)
- Voted YES on banning “dilate and extract” abortions. (Mar 2003)
- Voted YES on maintaining ban on abortions at clinics on military bases. (Jun 2000)
- Voted YES on banning “dilate and extract” abortions. (Oct 1999)
- Rated 0% by National Abortion Rights Action League.
- Rated 0% by Planned Parenthood.
- Despite his extreme voting record, 51 percent of women voters in battleground states have no idea what John McCain’s positions are on women’s reproductive health issues.
- Forty-nine percent of women currently backing McCain express pro-choice views, and 46 percent of women supporting McCain over Obama/Clinton want to see Roe v. Wade upheld.
- In McCain-Obama/McCain-Clinton matchups, 36 percent and 38 percent, respectively, of pro-choice McCain supporters say they are less likely to vote for McCain when told that he opposes Roe v. Wade.
Show off your McCain Style with Women for John McCain .com Gear!
The Community Financial Services Association's campaign to overturn House Bill 545 went live with a new website yesterday. Their website, Ohioans4financialfreedom, displays how out of touch they are with real Ohioans.
First, they say: "Protect 6,000 good-paying jobs that could be lost."
This is not accurate. House Bill 545 says absolutely nothing about closing any businesses or preventing the dispersion of payday loans. House Bill 545 simply caps interest rates and fees at 28% APR, protecting Ohio's consumers from predatory 391% APR interest. Payday lending stores have already started applying for licenses to continue operating under the new law from the Ohio Department of Commerce. If any stores close, it's because they choose to, not because they have to.
Second, they say: "Protect your financial freedom and private financial choices."
Payday lenders target low-income neighborhoods where it is easier for them to encourage people to walk through the door. Neon signs with "Get cash in minutes!" and "Easy cash quick," etc. Once a borrower is trapped in a cycle of payday loans, it becomes necessary for the consumer to keep taking out loans. This is not a choice! Usurious payday loans at 391% are bad for Ohioans and bad for the Ohio economy. Usury is not freedom!
Third, they say: "Protect your right to privacy about your personal finances."
This is a nice catch phrase that appeals to just about everyone! House Bill 545 includes a provision calling for the creation of a database that will let lenders know how many loans a person has taken out at a given time. This allows lenders to lend according to borrowers ability to repay - something neither predatory mortgage lenders nor payday lenders seem to care about.
And finally, once again, the industry uses their lame argument for why their referendum should be on the ballot: "Ohioans have a right to repeal bad laws."
Well, it bears repeating that House Bill 545 is one of the best consumer protection laws in the country and will help hundreds of thousands of Ohioans escape the debt trap. Ohioans do have a right to overturn bad laws, but this referendum effort is not being mounted by Ohioans, but by industry lobbyists and attorneys flown in on their corporate jets. Where are the citizens working on this referendum? Where are the consumers calling for 391% interest? They are nowhere to be found. Instead, the industry lobby CFSA is the sole donor to the effort to repeal House Bill 545. This is right in line with what they are doing in other states like Arizona where they've spent $8.7 million to overturn a consumer law and in Virginia where they succeeded in buying higher interest rates for a low, low price of $20 million.
The Ohio government should be PROTECTING consumers from predatory business practices that rely on borrowers getting trapped in a cycle of debt! Payday lending is bad for Ohio!
Jennifer Brunner has performed a really fine public service in plain sight - PLEASE read this carefully and consider distributing this to as many people as possible that need voter advocacy help:
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/publications/electVoterPubs/bringid/order_bringIDcards.aspx
Phone: (614)-466-3613
Toll Free: (877)-767-6446
Order Now: Bring ID Cards
Please fill out your mailing information below along with a way for us to contact you in case we have any additional questions about your order (either phone number or e-mail address).
Note: Please use a street address instead of a P.O. Box in case your order is too large for regular mail.
If you are requesting a quantity greater than 50, please call our publication request line (614-466-3613) to make special arrangements. Thank you.
McCain’s War on Women
Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) campaign and the media would have us believe that herds of disaffected women voters will be stampeding to the Republicans this year because a woman candidate won’t be on the presidential ballot in November.
McCain’s campaign has been making a clear play for women voters in recent weeks, hosting conference calls with Republican women and touting that his policies on national security, the economy and healthcare appeal to women voters.
But the suggestion that women — and feminist women, at that — will be lining up behind him is a fairytale. At least, it should be. McCain’s record and policies on issues of importance to women are neither moderate nor maverick.
Union Chinese Wal-Mart employees will get an 8% raise this year and next.
Non-union American Wal-Mart employees have averaged a 3% annual raise over the last 3.5 years.
MomsRising.org concludes women -- especially moms and minorities -- are disproportionately underpaid:
Earlier this week the headline on the front page of the New York Times declared, "Women Are Now Equal as Victims of Poor Economy." "Equal"? Really?
While it's true that both men and women are suffering in this economic downturn, women still bear the lion's share of the burden. Women in the U.S. are still paid only 77 cents for every dollar earned by men -- mothers only 73 cents, and single mothers about 60 cents.
For women of color, the numbers are even worse -- African-American women earn 63 cents and Latina women earn 52 cents for every dollar paid to white men. With numbers like these, it's easy to see why protection from wage and other job discrimination is a critical component of economic security for women and families, especially in times of economic downturn.
Tell your Senators to support the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act now! http://www.momsrising.org/FairPay_Yes
This Act, which provides job discrimination protections, has already passed the U.S. House, nearly passed the U.S. Senate--but is currently stalled. Your voice is needed to get the bill moving forward again and to remind the Senate that the women of America are waiting for their vote on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, and that this is the only bill that would fully restore women's civil rights.
Forward this email to your friends and family so they can contact their U.S. Senators too. The more people the Senators hear from, the more likely they are to pass this bill in the Senate.
More About the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: Lilly Ledbetter, a manager at Goodyear Tires, endured pay discrimination (and thus the loss of significant wages) during her 19 years of employment--just for being a woman. She won a substantial settlement in a lower court and then the the Supreme Court ruled against Ledbetter, saying that pay discrimination claims must be made within 180 days after the pay is initially set. This effectively guts the ability to hold employers accountable when they pay women less than men--even if the discrimination continues for years.
Most people don't know how much their coworkers make, and so would have no way of discovering pay discrimination in time to meet this new requirement. The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act would fix this Supreme Court decision and restore the right of women and minorities to recover lost wages due to discrimination, as originally protected by the Civil Rights Act.
Congresswomen Betty Sutton of Ohio's 13th Congressional District joined several other Representatives and a Senator from across the nation in introducing legislation that would compensate troops and military families who have been exploited by the Pentagon's shameful practice of Stop Loss or commonly known as The Backdoor Draft.
Our military family is asking that readers on several Veterans and Military Family blogs and forums PLEASE contact your state Representatives and Senators in Congress to get behind and co-sponsor the Stop-Loss Compensation Act in the Senate and House (S. 3060 and H.R. 6205).
You will find our "Write Officials" link on the right hand side of the ProgressOhio Website, and to add extra bite we ask you to please also select "Write Your Paper" to do a brief Letter to the Editor decrying this abusive practice and asking voters to speak out.
This is not about being pro or anti-war, it is about QUESTIONING practices that harm our troops, hurt military readiness, negatively impact military recruitment, and could eventually lead our government to 'no choice' but conscription - THE DRAFT.
Bobby Hanafin
Major, U.S. Air Force-Retired
The Mustang Major
Military Families Speak Out - OHIO
Read More »
- Will the Ohio General Assembly Give Men the Final Decision about a Woman's Reproductive Health Care Choices?
- cannot be performed until at least the 10th week of pregnancy, near the end of the first trimester,
- is an invasive procedure using a long needle through the abdomen to collect fetal cells,
- is expensive - up to $2,000 per test, and
- poses a potential medical risk.
- If the pregnancy resulted from rape, the woman would be required to provide a police report proving it.
- If the pregnancy resulted from incest, the woman would be required to provide a paternity test or a police report.
- If the woman chooses not to identify the prospective father (perhaps out of fear for her own physical well-being), her only recourse would be to continue the pregnancy against her wishes or have an illegal abortion, a first degree misdemeanor.
- Click here to make a secure contribution to the PPAO Action Fund to support our efforts to fight this legislation and to support pro-choice candidates.
- Sign our petition against HB 287.
One year ago, State Rep. John Adams (R-Sidney) introduced one of the most outrageous pieces of legislation we have ever seen.
House Bill 287 would require a woman to have the written informed consent of the prospective father of her fetus before being allowed to have an abortion.
That's right...If the man says "No," there will be no abortion. Period!
This bill may actually be scheduled for hearings in the coming weeks.
To raise awareness about this offensive bill, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio is partnering with ProgressOhio, an outreach organization that builds awareness of legislative issues.
Please click here to help us stop this bill!
You're not going to believe this...HB 287 also requires that, if the identity of the prospective father is unknown, a paternity test must be performed to determine his identity so that his consent could be obtained prior to performing the abortion.
What is left unsaid is that prenatal paternity testing:
The practical effect of the paternity test requirement would prevent some women from obtaining an abortion during the first trimester.
Once paternity is established, if the man says "No," there will be no abortion.
Please make a secure contribution to help us say "No!" to this outrageous bill!
Even worse...Speak out! Help ProgressOhio and Planned Parenthood "veto" this bill now!
We Can't Let Them Get Away with This!Here's what you can do to help us fight this outrageous legislation:
Visit the web address below to tell your friends about HB 287, the Abortion Veto Bill.
Tell-a-friend!
Brian Rothenberg
Executive Director
ProgressOhio.org
Click to Subscribe to "Shadows on High"
Please forward to your friends and colleagues!
ProgressOhio - "We're Powered By You"
Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, questioned Sen. John McCain's commitment to women's health care after Sen. McCain could not answer when asked if he thought it was fair that insurance companies cover Viagra but not birth control.
"Time after time, Sen. McCain has shown that he is out of touch when it comes to women's health care," said Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood Action Fund president. "Birth control is basic health care for women. But yesterday, Sen. McCain ducked a straightforward question about whether he thinks insurance companies should cover birth control. Women in America are still waiting for his answer."
In 2003, McCain voted NO on the Murray Amendment (S.Amdt 258 to S. 3, vote 45, 3/11/03), which would have improved the availability of contraceptives for women and required insurance coverage of prescription birth control.
Yesterday, aboard his campaign bus, the Straight Talk Express, had this exchange with a reporter:
Reporter: "? It was unfair that insurance companies cover Viagra but not birth control. Do you have an opinion on that?"
McCain responded: "I don't know enough about it to give you an informed answer."
McCain went on to say, "It's something that I had not thought much about, and I did hear about her response, but I hadn't thought much. But I will get, I will get back to you today on it."
According to the Guttmacher Institute, "Nearly all sexually active women (98 percent in 2002) have used at least one method of birth control."
Guttmacher also reports that women spend 68 percent more in out-of-pocket health care costs than men, in part because of reproductive health-related supplies and services.
Watch It:
Got this email today from Gary Dougherty, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio:
Will the Ohio General Assembly Give Men the Final Decision about a Woman's Reproductive Health Care Choices?
One year ago, State Rep. John Adams (R-Sidney) introduced one of the most outrageous pieces of legislation we have ever seen.
House Bill 287 would require a woman to have the written informed consent of the prospective father of her fetus before being allowed to have an abortion.
That's right...If the man says "No," there will be no abortion. Period!
This bill may actually be scheduled for hearings in the coming weeks.
To raise awareness about this offensive bill, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio is partnering with ProgressOhio, an outreach organization that builds awareness of legislative issues.
You're not going to believe this...HB 287 also requires that, if the identity of the prospective father is unknown, a paternity test must be performed to determine his identity so that his consent could be obtained prior to performing the abortion.
What is left unsaid is that prenatal paternity testing:
- cannot be performed until at least the 10th week of pregnancy, near the end of the first trimester,
- is an invasive procedure using a long needle through the abdomen to collect fetal cells,
- is expensive – up to $2,000 per test, and
- poses a potential medical risk.
The practical effect of the paternity test requirement would prevent some women from obtaining an abortion during the first trimester.
Once paternity is established, if the man says "No," there will be no abortion.
Even worse...- If the pregnancy resulted from rape, the woman would be required to provide a police report proving it.
- If the pregnancy resulted from incest, the woman would be required to provide a paternity test or a police report.
- If the woman chooses not to identify the prospective father (perhaps out of fear for her own physical well-being), her only recourse would be to continue the pregnancy against her wishes or have an illegal abortion, a first degree misdemeanor.
Help ProgressOhio and Planned Parenthood "veto" this bill now! We Can't Let Them Get Away with This!***
You're right, Gary, we can't let them get away with this. Furthermore, we need to get Republican noses out of our gynecologists' offices. This control-freak Big Brother attitude has got to stop.
Rep. Adams is not qualified to even vote on this bill, let alone introduce it. He apparently has no medical background whatsoever. "Attended Mesa Community College" is his only education credential.
It's like sponsoring a farm bill without bothering to talk to farmers about it. House Bill 287 is horrendously bad legislation. Please join me in signing Planned Parenthood's petition against HB 287.
If you thought government in the bedroom was bad, just wait until they start inspecting your toilet bowl. That could happen if right-to-life zealots in Colorado get their way. Washington Post:
LOS ANGELES -- A proposal to define a fertilized human egg as a person will land on Colorado's ballot this November, marking the first time that the question of when life begins will go before voters anywhere in the nation.
The Human Life Amendment, also known as the personhood amendment, says the words "person" or "persons" in the state constitution should "include any human being from the moment of fertilization." If voters agreed, legal experts say, it would give fertilized eggs the same legal rights and protections to which people are entitled.
The ballot initiative is funded by Colorado for Equal Rights, a grass-roots antiabortion organization. Its purpose, initiative sponsor Kristi Burton said, is to lay a legal and legislative basis for protecting the unborn. Its passage would also open the door to modifying other laws for the same purpose, she said.
As to what laws could then be modified, Burton would not elaborate. "We try not to focus on some of the issues that will be taken care of later on," she said, repeatedly saying that the amendment is not aimed at outlawing abortion....
"If we give fertilized eggs legal rights, abortion could be considered murder and a woman could be sent to jail for making the difficult life decision to terminate a pregnancy," said Crystal Clinkenbeard, spokeswoman for Protect Families, Protect Choice, a coalition of medical professionals, community groups and religious leaders who oppose the amendment.
The measure also could expand the reach of the law into other arenas, legal experts say. For instance, if a woman miscarries, she could be held responsible if it were found she caused it, even unintentionally. If she smoked or drank while pregnant, her behavior might be considered negligence. Damaged eggs might be eligible for monetary damages. The use of fertilized eggs at fertility clinics or in medical research labs would come into question because the disposal of unused eggs could be considered homicide.***
This Colorado ballot initiative is so absurd, it's bizarre. Putting something as deeply personal as family planning in the hands of voters is just dumb. Like John McCain says, people don't like government making decisions for them. This is like Big Brother watching you, except he's a control freak and misogynist.
As many as 40% of pregnancies end in miscarriage -- natural abortions. How is the government going to sort out which miscarriages are unintentional and which are induced abortions? Body Fluid Police?
That's only the beginning of the legal morass this legislation would cause if passed. If a pregnant woman is legally two people can she vote twice? Would Angelina Jolie get to vote three times?
Get a grip, Colorado.
21 Reasons R's should shut up about abortion
Help undo the mess left by abstinence-only education
During Vietnam it was IMPOSSIBLE for Military Families to Question the War! Part One of a Two Part Op/Ed and Book Review By Robert L. Hanafin, Major, U.S. Air Force – Retired AND Willard D. Gray, First Sergeant (E-8) U.S. Army-Retired
Home Front: Families at War – a Primer for what Military Families who question, not oppose, but only question the War on Terror can expect from their community if they had done the same during Vietnam. This is a must read if you are a member of Military Families Speak Out (MFSO) or can relate to our concerns.
http://www.amazon.com/Home-Front-Vietnam-Families-War/dp/1600020194
Read More »
The following article is reposted from Huffington Post with permission of the author Bobby Muller, President of Veterans for America (VFA). Bobby Hanafin SP/5, U.S. Army (69-76) Major, U.S. Air Force-Retired (77-94) Military Families Speak Out - OHIO Veterans for America, Editorial Board Member, Our Troops Newsladder
SEE COMMENTS SECTION FOR LINKS TO OUR TROOPS NEWSLADDER AND HUFFINGTON POST ARTICLE BY BOBBY MULLER.
Read More »
Bobby Hanafin
The Mustang Major Read More »
Several of the Philanthropy organizations mentioned here were selected by Congress to be watchdogs over the growing number of Veteran and Patriotic related charities.
I personally worked with the American Philanthropy Institute (API) that gave testimony before Congress on the shameful inefficiency of many well known Veterans Service Organizations and the ever increasing number of Patriotic causes from Yellow Ribbons to Recruitment mass mailings, up to an including fraudulent claims that in order to get one's Veterans Benefits, one had to join the American Legion.
I brought these complaints to the attention of both the U.S. Postal Inspectors Service and Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio. I even asked then Ohio Attorney General Mark Dann to review the accounts on file with the Charity Office of the Ohio Attorney General to see for himself that several Veterans Organizations such as the American Legion and VFW were mismanaging fund raising efforts focused more so on recruitment outreach, administrative overhead, and paying off commercial ad agencies.
Both the federal Postal Service and Senator Brown's office tried to discourage pursuit of these findings or any investigation FEARING the political clout of the American Legion and VFW.
I frankly gave up by deciding myself and extended military family, plus anyone else who would listen to me TO NOT DONATE TO ANY PATRIOTIC OR VETERANS CHARITY UNTIL THEIR LEADERSHIP CLEANED UP ITS ACT AND MORE SO UNTIL AT LEAST HERE IN OHIO such mismanagement and inefficiency in fund raising is EXPOSED and FIXED.
Folks, we are heading into hard economic times that impact ALL CHARITABLE organizations even as these Flag Waving and Support Out Troops groups proliferate. Ohio politicians of both parties are looking the other way, so it is up to you THE DONOR to check with the Ohio Attorney Generals Office and ask for a review of all charitable organizations to confirm $$$ they are raising is going toward the purpose YOU expected.
Anyway, this is my way of A CAUTIONARY NOTE to those Veterans', Military Family, and passionate Patriotic Organizations that have set up POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEES. When it comes time for a white glove audit of the fund raising accounts of charitable patriots, those with a PAC are going to receive the most attention, and better have your fund raising accounts balanced in favor of your membership and mission.
Bobby Hanafin
Major, U.S. Air Force-Retired
PS: Those of you who believe I'm being too harsh on Patriotic War Profiteers, and Veterans Organizations (regardless how much political clout they do or do not have), take my word for it (or goe to any base and request a community tour or visit).
You will note that the Army and Air Force Exchange Service and DOD Commissary Agency provides more support for our troops, even those stationed in war zones like Iraq and Afghanistan more so than anytime America has been at war. OUR TROOPS ARE ALWAYS PROVIDED SUPPORT BY CONGRESS AND THEIR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, that is their job and our tax payer dollars in action. There frankly is no need to give donations to any active duty troops or families (National Guard units could use as much moral support as possible given proximity to active duty base support is questionable).
EXAMPLE: In order to make an in their face POINT to Flag Wavers and We Support Our Troops more than thou nuts, I wear a T-Shirt that has the Military Star Card emblazed on the front and back. War profiteers HATE to see someone who knows how our troops are really supplied PROVE IT!
Put another way, our troops received better shopping and entertainment support than they did war fighting equipment going into the occupation. IN SUM, OUR TROOPS ARE NOT CHARITY CASES, SO WHY SHOULD THEY BE CONSIDERED AS SUCH WHEN THEY GET OUT???? Read More »
Our military family was thrilled to note that progressive PACs have beat this effort to the punch in battleground states by launching counter campaign ads focusing on that which American Voters can relate to - HOW MUCH THE WAR IN IRAQ COST IN $$$$$$$$$$
Stay on that theme, and as the economy worsens, and it will the longer we Stay in Iraq, that RELATIONSHIP will checkmate anything that PRO-WAR Veterans and Military Families have to say. Also, remember that those 20,000 or so mention below VOLUNTEERED to go to Iraqnam, and VOLUNTEER to stay. If that is true then 20,000 is just about the right number to garrison Iraq and Afghanistan as we pull out. SEND THOSE 20,000 back to or keep them in Iraq and Afghanistan then allow those who volunteer not to stay LEAVE.
Why do WE THE PEOPLE have to make everything so complicated. Oh, the icing on the cake. If 20,000 Veterans can afford a Million bucks to pay for PRO-WAR campaigns, they sure can raise the funds needed to PAY FOR THE WAR. There should be a tax cut for any American who does not want to pay for the War in Iraq. That way those Americans (regardless of party) who passionately want to commit to the War on Terror can do so. HAVE AT IT!!! Read More »
One in four teenage girls has a sexually transmitted infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control. One in four! "Additionally, teen birth rates are going up and the cost of birth control is skyrocketing," said Gary Dougherty, State Legislative Director, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio.
On May 30, 2007, the bi-partisan Ohio Prevention First Act was introduced in the Ohio House of Representatives. This landmark legislation will reduce unintended pregnancies through:
- Realistic sex education and teen pregnancy prevention programs
- Funding for family planning programs
- Guaranteed access to birth control prescriptions
- Contraceptive equity
- Emergency contraception access and education
It is critical that this commonsense legislation be scheduled for a hearing before the end of the year. You can help make that happen.
Sign the petition urging the Chairman of the House Health Committee, Rep. Lynn Wachtmann (R-Napoleon), to schedule a hearing on the Ohio Prevention First Act.
PPAO and I appreciate your support. I can't think of any legislation the General Assembly could undertake that could benefit more Ohioans more positively health-wise.
By E. J. Dionne Jr. Washington Post
Monday, July 7, 2008; A13
EXERPTS (LINKS TO SOURCE TO BE FOUND IN COMMENTS SECTION)
Posted by Bobby Hanafin
Major, U.S. Air Force-Retired
"When a candidate calls a second news conference to say the same thing he thought he said at the first one, you know he knows he has a problem."
With that lead in, Washington Post some OP/editorial commenter, I never heard of throws out a pun about Republican efforts to trap Obama in a Catch 22 on Iraq that they hope will either cost him votes or degrade any trust in swing voters that Obama would seriously end the Iraq War, if all "appears" to be going well with what could become an EXTENDED SURGE.
Read on. Read More »
Although Wade is obviously talking about Veterans in California, the concerns he raises applies to each and every state, especially considering each state has committed more state militia [National Guard] troops to combat than anytime in recent history.
Wade is a San Diego attorney, and senior adviser on military and veterans affairs for California Lt. Gov. John Garamendi. A former assistant secretary of defense, Sanders is a combat veteran of Vietnam.
As a former Swift Boat commander, Wade reminds us that when we use the negative political terminology "swiftie or swift boating," we fail to recognize and degrade the wartime service of thousands of Swift Boat crew members who would no more smear or assassinate the character and reputation of another Veteran by questioning their military service, than would MOST OF AMERICA'S REAL VETERANS. Having been among those, even Veterans, who continue to use that degrading term, to Wade Sanders and Swift Boat crew members with his integrity, I personally apologize.
Bobby Hanafin
SP/5, U.S. Army (69-76)
Major, U.S. Air Force-Retired (77-94) Read More »
Posts
Michael Collins: An Interview with Vincent Bugliosi - Part ...
Ohio House Speaker Jon Husted joins the Governor and Senate ...
COLUMBUS - Ohio's top three political leaders announced toda...
Gov. Strickland is trying to keep the "paid sick day's bill"...
Ethics Problems
In Ohio's Supreme Court
